نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
1 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تهران مرکز، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی
2 استادیار دانشکده مهندسی صنایع ،دانشگاه صنعتی خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی
عنوان مقاله [English]
In this paper, we examine the processes of the meteorological organization and how they are categorized as organizational items. These items in each organization map the processes and the way in which the organization performs its tasks and tasks. At the macro level, processes are dominated by the processes of the central processes the main categories of support processes are categorized and at lower levels, they will briefly describe how they are conducted and the flow of information in the organization. Public policy is a set of decisions that are tied up by experts to achieve specific goals or to obtain the appropriate means to achieve those goals. These decisions are made according to how the processes are performed and how they are done. To be the core function of the strategy is to create a competitive advantage for the organization, and it can be used to create value (by defining the key factors of the success factor) for users. Strategies can be defined from the standpoint of its characteristics or how it is shaped or its role in the success of the organization. The process, strategy is intended to create distinctive competencies in the organization to create value. The process of conducting and reviewing the paper was initially initiated from the design of the organization's process map in order to transfer the organization from task-oriented to processor, then each of the process metrics are linked to the key performance indicators in the strategy map. Then, the relationship of each of the processes in the process map with the strategy map in the operational sample of the knowledge management project for managing the performance of processes based on a balanced scorecard has been identified in the meteorological organization The balanced scorecard, compiled by Kaplan and Norton from four main perspectives, was studied by many organizations from a different perspective, and ultimately this model, developed by the original model of the balanced scorecard, is a model for assessing the Meteorological Organization This paper describes how to produce and generate data through this model and ultimately have been successful in collecting intelligent data in the Meteorological Organization of the country so that we have been able to sample the data from an hour to Minutes increase
10. Lee, H., Kwak, W. and Han, I., 1995. Developing a business performance evaluation system: An analytic hierarchical model. The Engineering Economist, 40(4), pp.343-357.
11. Samoilenko, S. and Osei-Bryson, K.M., 2008. Increasing the discriminatory power of DEA in the presence of the sample heterogeneity with cluster analysis and decision trees. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(2), pp.1568-1581.
12. Lee, H., Park, Y. and Choi, H., 2009. Comparative evaluation of performance of national R&D programs with heterogeneous objectives: A DEA approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), pp.847-855.
13. Lamotte, G. and Carter, G., 2000. Are the Balanced scorecard and the EFQM Excellence model mutually exclusive or do they work together to bring added value to a company. EFQM Common Interest Days.
14. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P., 2001. Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Accounting horizons, 15(1), pp.87-104.
15. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P., 1995. Putting the Balanced Scorecard. Performance measurement, management, and appraisal sourcebook, p.66.
16. Andersen, H., Lawrie, G. and Shulver, M., 2000. The balanced scorecard vs. the EFQM business excellence model. 2GC Limited, UK, http://www. 2gc. co. uk/pdf/2GC-BSCvBEMp. pdf, 14(08), p.04.
17. Hepworth, P., 1998. Weighing it up-a literature review for the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management development, 17(8), pp.559-563.
18. Papalexandris, A., Ioannou, G., Prastacos, G. and Soderquist, K.E., 2005. An integrated methodology for putting the balanced scorecard into action. European Management Journal, 23(2), pp.214-227.
19. Carrington, R., Puthucheary, N., Rose, D. and Yaisawarng, S., 1997. Performance measurement in government service provision. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8(4), pp.415-430.
20. Brock, F.V., Richardson, S.J. and Richardson, S.J., 2001. Meteorological measurement systems. Oxford University Press, USA.
21. Jarraud, M., 2008. Guide to meteorological instruments and methods of observation (WMO-No. 8). World Meteorological Organisation: Geneva, Switzerland.
22. Stearns, C.R., Keller, L.M., Weidner, G.A. and Sievers, M., 1993. Monthly mean climatic data for Antarctic automatic weather stations. Antarctic meteorology and climatology: studies based on automatic weather stations, 61, pp.1-21.
23. Johansson, E., Thorsson, S., Emmanuel, R. and Krüger, E., 2014. Instruments and methods in outdoor thermal comfort studies–The need for standardization. Urban Climate, 10, pp.346-366.
24. Zahumenský, I., 2004. Guidelines on quality control procedures for data from automatic weather stations. World Meteorological Organization, Switzerland.
25. Van de Wal, R.S.W., Greuell, W., Van den Broeke, M.R., Reijmer, C.H. and Oerlemans, J., 2005. Surface mass-balance observations and automatic weather station data along a transect near Kangerlussuaq, West Greenland. Annals of Glaciology, 42, pp.311-316.
26. Stewart, I.D. and Oke, T.R., 2012. Local climate zones for urban temperature studies. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(12), pp.1879-1900.
Hubbard, K.G., Guttman, N.B., You, J. and Chen, Z., 2007. An improved QC process for temperature in the daily cooperative weather observations. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 24(2), pp.206-213.