پژوهش های اقلیم شناسی

پژوهش های اقلیم شناسی

حداکثر بارش محتمل در دوره پایه و آینده (2030-2060) تحت شرایط تغییراقلیم در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استاد، پژوهشگاه هواشناسی و علوم جو، تهران.
2 کارشناس پژهشی، پژوهشگاه هواشناسی و علوم جو، تهران.
10.22034/jcr.2026.562814.1728
چکیده
تغییر اقلیم با تشدید نوسانات چرخه هیدرولوژیکی، ایمنی سازه‌های آبی را با چالش‌های جدی مواجه می‌کند. در این پژوهش، با استفاده از داده‌های حداکثر بارش ۲۴ساعته97 ایستگاه سینوپتیک، مقادیر حداکثر بارش محتمل (PMP) ایران در دوره پایه‌ (1990–2020) و دوره آینده (2030–2060) تحت سناریوهای SSP2.6، SSP4.5 و SSP8.5 برآورد شد. پس از ارزیابی عملکرد مدل‌های CMIP6 با نمودار تیلور، داده‌های بارش روزانه با مدل LARS-WG ریزمقیاس‌سازی و مقادیر PMP با روش اصلاح‌شده هرشفیلد–دسا محاسبه گردید. نتایج نشان داد که مقدار PMP در دوره پایه ناهمگنی مکانی قابل‌توجهی داشته و از کمتر از 100 میلی‌متر در مناطق خشک مرکزی تا بیش از 630 میلی‌متر در سواحل جنوبی دریای خزر متغیر است. بیشترین مقادیر PMP در نواحی مرطوب شمال، شمال‌غرب و دامنه‌های غربی زاگرس مشاهده شد. بررسی میزان PMP در دوره آینده نشان داد که در اغلب مناطق کشور، PMP نسبت به دوره پایه افزایش می‌یابد و سناریوی SSP4.5 بیشترین افزایش را نشان می‌دهد؛ به‌طوری‌که در برخی ایستگاه‌های شمالی حاشیه خزر افزایش PMP به بیش از 190 میلی‌متر رسید. همچنین تحت سناریوی SSP2.6، مقدار PMP در برخی ایستگاه‌های ساحلی جنوب و جنوب‌شرق کشور بین 70 تا 233 میلی‌متر افزایش یافت. در مقابل، تحت سناریوی SSP8.5، در بخش‌هایی از شمال، شمال‌غرب و غرب کشور کاهش 20 تا 170 میلی‌متری PMP نسبت به SSP4.5 مشاهده شد. نتایج نشان داد که پاسخ PMP به تغییر اقلیم در ایران وابسته به نوع اقلیم و شرایط توپوگرافی بوده و مناطق مرطوب و نیمه‌مرطوب حساسیت بیشتری به گرمایش جهانی دارند. همچنین اگرچه مقادیر PMP در مناطق خشک کمتر است، اما به دلیل نفوذپذیری پایین خاک، پوشش گیاهی ضعیف و محدودیت شبکه زهکشی، خطر وقوع سیلاب‌های ناگهانی همچنان قابل‌توجه است. نتایج این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که تغییر اقلیم با تغییر الگوی مکانی و شدت حداکثر بارش محتمل، خطر وقوع سیلاب‌های حدی را در بسیاری از مناطق ایران افزایش می‌دهد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Probable Maximum Precipitation in the Baseline and Future Period (2030–2060) under Climate Change Conditions in Iran

نویسندگان English

Ebrahim Fatahi 1
Hadis Sadeghi 2
1 Prof of Research Institute of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science (RIMAS), Tehran, Iran.
2 Research Institute of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science (RIMAS), Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction

In recent decades, climate change has substantially intensified environmental and hydrological challenges worldwide. Rising temperatures, increased frequency of extreme events, and altered precipitation patterns have a significant impact on the stability and performance of hydraulic structures. One of the most important parameters used in the design of dams, reservoirs, channels, spillways, and other critical hydraulic structures is the Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP), which plays a key role in estimating the likelihood of extreme floods and in designing structures capable of withstanding such extreme conditions. In arid and semi-arid regions such as Iran, the impacts of climate change on Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) are complex. Therefore, evaluating changes in Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) during the baseline and future periods under various climate scenarios is crucial for flood risk management, the design of resilient hydraulic structures, and reducing vulnerability across different regions of the country.

Materials and methods

In this study, daily precipitation data from 96 Iranian synoptic stations for the baseline period 1990–2020 and outputs from CMIP6 models for the future period 2030–2060 were used under the SSP2.6, SSP4.5, and SSP8.5 scenarios. First, the performance of the GCMs at each station in simulating precipitation was evaluated using Taylor diagrams, and the optimal model for each station was identified. After selecting the optimal climate model for each station based on the Taylor diagram, daily precipitation data for the future period (2030–2060) were downscaled using the LARS-WG model under three emission scenarios. The modified Desa-Hirschfield method was used to estimate the Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP). In this method, extreme values are excluded from the data series, after which the revised mean and standard deviation are calculated. This process improves the accuracy of the results and reduces estimation errors. Previous studies in Iran have shown that the classical Hershfield method overestimates PMP, whereas the Desa-Hershfield method produces more reasonable results that are better aligned with the characteristics of extreme precipitation. Therefore, in this study, the baseline and future PMP were estimated for each of the 96 stations using the modified Desa method. Then, the obtained values for both the baseline and future periods were mapped using the Kriging method to reveal the spatial patterns of PMP changes in Iran.

Results and discussion

The results indicated that the spatial distribution of PMP in Iran is highly heterogeneous, and factors such as topography, elevation, distance from moisture sources, proximity to the sea, and humid atmospheric flows play a key role in determining PMP values. The highest PMP values during the baseline period were observed in the humid regions along the Caspian Sea coast, the northwestern highlands, and parts of the western slopes of the Zagros Mountains. In contrast, the central, eastern, and southeastern regions of Iran exhibited the lowest PMP values due to their distance from moisture sources and relatively flat topography. The results of Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) for the future period indicated that the spatial distribution pattern of PMP is similar to that of the baseline period, with an increase in PMP values expected in most parts of Iran compared to the baseline. The largest increase occurs under the SSP4.5 scenario. According to this scenario, the greatest rise in PMP relative to the baseline period is expected in the humid temperate regions of northern Iran and the semi-humid areas of western and northwestern Iran. An increase in PMP was also observed in the arid and semi-arid central and southern regions, but it is less intense compared to the humid climates. According to the SSP2.6 scenario, the greatest increase in PMP relative to the baseline period is observed primarily in the southern and southeastern regions. This difference in the spatial pattern of PMP increase is likely due to the differing responses of climate models to changes in temperature, pressure, and synoptic circulations. The results also indicated that the Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) under the SSP8.5 scenario is lower than under the other two scenarios. Under the SSP8.5 scenario, a relative decline in PMP compared to the baseline period was detected in certain northern and northwestern regions. This finding contradicts the initial expectation based on the theory that atmospheric moisture-holding capacity increases with temperature, and indicates that under very high emission scenarios, dynamic and thermodynamic atmospheric patterns may alter the trajectories of precipitation systems or the development of convective clouds. Therefore, the distinct response of humid regions under the SSP8.5 scenario highlights the complexity of climate change impacts and underscores the need for rigorous regional-scale analyses. On the other hand, the results showed that in the temperate and humid regions of the north, as well as the western slopes of the Zagros, although the Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) is high, the relative risk of flooding is lower than in hot and dry regions due to higher soil permeability, dense vegetation cover, and more efficient drainage networks.



Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrated that climate change exerts a substantial influence on variations in Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) across Iran, and that the spatial patterns of these changes differ markedly among various regions of the country. In the near future, the intensity of PMP is expected to increase across most regions of the country, with the greatest rise projected under the SSP4.5 scenario. A decrease in PMP in some northern parts of the country under the SSP8.5 scenario reflects the complexity and nonlinear behavior of precipitation systems under conditions of intense global warming. The results also showed that a high PMP does not necessarily imply a greater hazard, as geomorphological and hydrological conditions play a decisive role. Accordingly, strengthening flood-management strategies—particularly the design of hydrological structures in the arid regions of the country—is of critical importance, while in humid regions, runoff management and soil-erosion reduction are essential. The findings of this study highlight the need to revise water-resources management policies, hydraulic-structure design standards, and urban-planning strategies by incorporating the dynamic behavior of PMP under future climate conditions.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Desa
Hershfield
Iran
Probable Maximum Flood (PMF)
Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP)
1.     Ababaei, B., Sohrabi, T., Mirzaei, F., & Karimi, B. 2010, Evaluation of a stochastic weather generator in different climates of Iran, Computer and Information Science, 3(3), pp.217–229. 
2.     Afrooz, A.H., Akbari, H., Rakhshandehroo, G.R., & Pourtouiserkani, A. 2015, Climate Change Impact on Probable Maximum Precipitation in Chenar-Rahdar River Basin, Watershed Management, pp. 36-47. DOI:10.1061/9780784479322.004.
3.     Afzali-Gorouh, Z., Bakhtiari, B., & Kourosh Qaderi. 2018, Probable maximum precipitation estimation in a humid climate, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, pp. 3109–3119. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-3109-2018.
4.     Afzali-Gorouh, Z., Faridhosseini, A., Bakhtiari, B., Mosaedi, A., & Salehnia, N. 2022, Monitoring and projection of climate change impact on 24-h probable maximum precipitation in the Southeast of Caspian Sea, Nat. Hazards, 114, pp. 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05380-1.
5.     Agnihotri, L., Deshpande, N., & Kulkarni, A. 2025, Probable maximum precipitation estimation and its spatio-temporal analysis, MAUSAM, 76(2), pp. 629–638. https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v76i2.6279.
6.     Ahmad, I., Zhang, F., Tayyab, M., Anjum, M., Zaman, M., Liu, J., Farid, H., & Saddique, Q. 2018, Spatiotemporal analysis of precipitation variability in annual, seasonal and extreme values over upper Indus River basin, Atmospheric Research, 213, pp. 346–360.
7.     Ahmadi, M., Lashkari, H., & Azimi, P. 2015, The impact of daily Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) on the hydrological hazards of the south west region of Caspian Sea, Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazards, 2(2), pp. 69–83.
8.     Beauchamp, J., Leconte, R., Trudel, M., & Brissette, F. 2013, Estimation of the summer-fall PMP and PMF of a northern watershed under a changed climate, Water Resour. Res., 49, pp. 3852–3862. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20336.
9.     Chen, X., Hossain, F., & Leung, L.R. 2017, Probable maximum precipitation in the U.S. Pacific Northwest in a changing climate, Water Resources Research, 53, pp. 9600–9622. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021094.
10. Desa, M.N.M., Noriah, A.B., & Rakhecha, P.R. 2001, Probable maximum precipitation for 24 h duration over Southeast Asia monsoon region-Selangor, Malaysia, Atmospheric Research, 58, pp. 41–54.
11. Dryabari, S.J., Mohammadi, H., & Rezaei, G.H. 2012, Spatial Analysis of Probable Maximum Precipitation in Iran, Geographical Journal of Territory, 9(34), pp. 113–124.
12. Fattahi, E., Kamali, S., Asadi Oskouei, E., & Habibi, M. 2025, Investigating the Spatiotemporal Variation in Extreme Precipitation Indices in Iran from 1990 to 2020, Water, 17, 1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17081227.
13. Fattahi, E., & Habibi, M. 2022, Estimation of probable maximum precipitation 24-h (PMP 24-h) through statistical methods over Iran, Water Supply, 22(8), 6543. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.281.
14.  Francis, D., & Fonseca, R. 2024, Recent and projected changes in climate patterns in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, Scientific Reports, 14, 10279. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60976-w.
15. Ghahraman, B. 2008, The estimation of one day duration probable maximum precipitation over Atrak watershed in Iran, Iranian J Sci Technol, 32(B2), pp. 175–179.
16. Giorgi, F., Raffaele, F., & Coppola, E. 2019, The response of precipitation characteristics to global warming from climate projections, Earth System Dynamics, 10, pp. 73–89
17. Hassan, Z., Shamsudin, S. & Harun, S. 2014, Application of SDSM and LARS-WG for simulating and downscaling of rainfall and temperature, Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 116, pp.243–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-013-0951-8.
18.  Hiraga, Y., Tahara, R., & Meza, J. 2025, A methodology to estimate Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) under climate change using a numerical weather model, Journal of Hydrology, 652, 132659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132659
19.  Hong, J., Javan, K., Shin, Y., & Park, J.-S. 2021, Future Projections and Uncertainty Assessment of Precipitation Extremes in Iran from the CMIP6 Ensemble, Atmosphere, 12, 1052. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12081052
20. Karimi, S., Karimi, S., Yavari, A.R., & Niksokhan, M.H. 2015, Prediction of temperature and precipitation in Damavand catchment in Iran by using LARS-WG in future, Earth Sciences, 4(3), pp.95–100. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20150403.12 
21. Krige, D.G., 1951, A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand. Journal of the Chemical, Metallurgical and Mining Society of South Africa, 52(6), pp.119–139. 
22. Li, Z., Li, X., Wang, Y., & Quiring, S. 2019, Impact of climate change on precipitation patterns in Houston, Texas, USA, Anthropocene, 25, pp. 1–14
23. Martin, A., Fournier, E., & Jalbert, J. 2024, Statistical estimation of probable maximum precipitation, EGUsphere [preprint]. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2594
24. Matheron, G. 1963, Principles of geostatistics, Economic Geology, 58(8), pp.1246–1266.
25.  Mirzaei, S., Vafakhah, M., Pradhan, B., & Jalil Alavi, S.J. 2020, Prediction and Analysis of Flood Zones under Climate Change Conditions based on CanESM2 Model’s Scenarios, Journal of Ecohydrology, 7(2), pp. 551–562.
https://doi.org/10.22059/ije.2020.299030.1300.
26. Mohammadzadeh, N., Amiri, B.J., Endergoli, L.E., & Karimi, S., 2019, Coupling Tank Model and LARS-Weather Generator in assessments of the impacts of climate change on water resources, Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering, 27(1), pp.14–24. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjce-2019-0003.
27. Munawar, S., Rahman, G., Moazzam, M.F.U., Miandad, M., Ullah, K., Al-Ansari, N., & Linh, N.T.T. 2022, Future Climate Projections Using SDSM and LARS-WG Downscaling Methods for CMIP5 GCMs over the Transboundary Jhelum River Basin of the Himalayas Region, Atmosphere, 13, 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13060898.
28. Paimazd, S. 2002, Comparison of Synoptic and Statistic Methods in PMP Estimation and Converting it to PMF. Case Study: Eastern Hormuzgan Province, MSc thesis, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran.
29.  Ramak, Z., Porhemmat, J., Sedghi, H., Fattahi, E., & Lashni-Zand, M. 2017, The climate change effect on probable maximum precipitation in a catchment. A case study of the Karun River catchment in the Shalu bridge site (Iran), Russian Meteorology and Hydrology, 42(3), pp. 204–211. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373917030086.
30.  Rastogi, D., Kao, S.-C., Ashfaq, M., Mei, R., Kabela, E.D., Gangrade, S., Naz, B.S., Preston, B.L., Singh, N., & Anantharaj, V.G. 2017, Effects of climate change on probable maximum precipitation: A sensitivity study over the Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa River Basin, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 122, pp. 4808–4828. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026001
31.  Sarkar, S., & Maity, R. 2020, Estimation of Probable Maximum Precipitation in the context of climate change, MethodsX, 7, 100904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.100904.
32. Semenov, M.A., & Stratonovitch, P. 2010, Use of multi-model ensembles from global climate models for assessment of climate change impacts, Climate Research, 41, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00836.
33. Semenov, M.A., & Barrow, E.M. 1997, Use of a stochastic weather generator in the development of climate change scenarios, Climatic Change, 35, pp.397–414.
34. Su, B., Sun, H., Wang, A., Zhai, J., Huang, J., Wang, Y., Wen, Sh., & Zeng, X. 2018, Impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C and 2.0 °C on precipitation patterns in China by regional climate model (COSMO-CLM), Atmospheric Research, 203, pp. 83–94
35. Tabari, H., & Willems, P. 2018, Seasonally varying footprint of climate change on precipitation in the Middle East, Scientific Reports, 8, 4435. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22795-8
36.  Tajbakhsh, M., & Al-Ansari, N. 2019, Comparative study of multi-station method and Hershfield’s approaches for PMP determination (case study: Northeast of Iran), Sustain. Water Resour. Manag., 5, pp. 1133–1141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-018-0291-z
37. Visser, J.B., Kim, S., Wasko, C., Nathan, R., & Sharma, A. 2022, The impact of climate change on operational Probable Maximum Precipitation estimates, Water Resources Research, 58, e2022WR032247. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032247
38. Wan Ariffin, W.N.H., Mohd Sidek, L., Basri, H., Torres, A.M., Ahmed, A.N., & Ahmad Bukhari, N.I. 2025, Strengthening Dam Safety Under Climate Change: A Risk-Informed Overtopping Assessment, Water, 17, 2856. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17192856
39. Xiong, J., Guo, S.H., Bhishek, A., Yin, J., Xu, C., Wang, J., & Guo, J. 2024, Variation and attribution of probable maximum precipitation of China using a high-resolution dataset in a changing climate, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, pp. 1873–1895.
40. Zarrin, A., & Dadashi-Roudbari, A. 2021, Projection of future extreme precipitation in Iran based on CMIP6 multi-model ensemble, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 144, pp. 643–660
41. Ziaee, S., Kalbali, E., Najafabadi, M., & Zakerinia, M. 2021, Approaches to adapting to impacts of climate change in northern Iran: The application of a Hydrology-Economics model, Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, pp. 25–35.