پژوهش های اقلیم شناسی

پژوهش های اقلیم شناسی

ارزیابی داده‌های Era5-land در برآورد شاخص‌های حدی دمای ماهانه در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دکترای آمار، استادیار، پژوهشکده اقلیم شناسی، پژوهشگاه هواشناسی و علوم جو، مشهد، ایران
2 کارشناس ارشد هواشناسی، پژوهشکده اقلیم شناسی، پژوهشگاه هواشناسی و علوم جو
10.22034/jcr.2025.512100.1691
چکیده
Land ERA5- جدیدترین مجموعه داده‌های بازتحلیل مرکز اروپایی پیش‌بینی‌های میان‌مدت وضع هوا (ECMWF) است که وضوح بیشتری نسبت به ERA-Interim و ERA5 دارد. با این‌حال قابلیت اعتماد این داده‌ها در برآورد شاخص‌های حدی ماهانه دما در ایران نامشخص است. از این رو در این مطالعه پایگاه اقلیمی ERA5-Land، با استفاده از داده‌های مشاهداتی 143 ایستگاه در دوره نرمال اقلیمی 1991-2020 مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. برای این منظور، شاخص‌های آماری ضریب همبستگی پیرسون (R)، خطای جذر میانگین مربعات (RMSE)، ضریب کارآیی نش‌ساتکلیف (NS)، شاخص اریبی (Bias)، میانگین قدرمطلق خطا (MAE) و ضریب کلینگ‌گوپتا (KGE)، برای شاخص‌های حدی دمای ماهانه ERA5-land، شامل بیشینه ماهانه دمای حداکثر روزانه (TXx)، بیشینه ماهانه دمای حداقل روزانه (TNx)، کمینه ماهانه دمای حداکثر روزانهTXn))، کمینه ماهانه دمای حداقل روزانه (TNn) در هر یک از ایستگاه‌ها محاسبه شد و تغییرات این شاخص‌ها به طور مکانی تحلیل شدند. سپس متوسط شاخص‌های ذکر شده در 6 ناحیه معرف تنوع اقلیمی در کشور به دست آمد و مورد مقایسه قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که متوسط RMSE برای این شاخص‌ها به ترتیب 79/2، 57/2، 23/2 و 78/3 بوده و به طور کلی دقت خوبی در برآورد دماهای حدی وجود دارد. در بیشتر ایستگاه‌ها شاخص‌های حدی اغلب کم برآورد شده‌اند. گرچه نتایج ضریب همبستگی برای بیشتر ایستگاه‌ها بالای 85/0 است، این دقت برای شاخص سردترین شب ماه (TNn) در ایستگاه‌های جنوب غرب کشور مطلوب نیست. به همین ترتیب، ضریب نش در برخی ایستگاه‌ها منفی شده است، که نشان‌دهنده ضعف داده‌های ERA5-Land در برآورد این پارامتر در برخی ایستگاه‌ها است. در نهایت، دقت داده‌های بازتحلیل ERA5-Land متناسب با نوع شاخص حدی و منطقه متفاوت است و برای چند ایستگاه خاص باید با احتیاط بیشتری استفاده شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of ERA5-Land Data in Estimating Monthly Extreme Temperature Indices in Iran

نویسندگان English

zohreh javanshiri 1
fatemeh Abbasi 2
1 climatoligical research institute. Assistant Researcher, Mashhad, Iran
2 Climatological Research Institute Mashad
چکیده English

Evaluation of ERA5-Land Data in Estimating Monthly Extreme Temperature Indices in Iran

An investigation was undertaken to ascertain the suitability of the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset, a recent product of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) offering enhanced spatial resolution relative to its predecessors, for the accurate estimation of monthly extreme temperature indices across the diverse climatic landscape of Iran. Recognizing the inherent uncertainties associated with the application of global reanalysis data at regional scales, particularly in estimating extreme events, the current study rigorously evaluated the performance of ERA5-Land against observational records from a network of 143 meteorological stations spanning the standard climate normal period from 1991 to 2020. The evaluation framework incorporated a suite of established statistical metrics, including the Pearson correlation coefficient (R) to assess the strength of linear association, the bias that reflecting the tendency to overestimate or underestimate a quantity due to inherent inaccuracies, the root mean square error (RMSE) to quantify the magnitude of overall error, the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NS) to determine the predictive power relative to the mean of observations, relative bias to identify systematic over- or underestimation, mean absolute error (MAE) to measure the average magnitude of errors, and the Kling-Gupta efficiency coefficient (KGE) to provide a comprehensive assessment of correlation, variability bias, and mean bias for the monthly extreme temperature indices: maximum monthly daily maximum temperature (TXx), maximum monthly daily minimum temperature (TNx), minimum monthly daily maximum temperature (TXn), and minimum monthly daily minimum temperature (TNn). Furthermore, a detailed analysis of the spatial distribution of these performance metrics was conducted to elucidate regional variations in ERA5-Land's accuracy, followed by a comparative assessment of the average index values across six distinct climatic regions within Iran, thereby providing a comprehensive understanding of the dataset's capabilities and limitations in representing extreme. The results showed that the average RMSE across all stations for the four Monthly extreme temperature indices studied, TXx, TNx, TXn, and TNn, are 2.79, 2.57, 2.23, and 3.78, respectively, indicating that the ERA5-Land reanalysis data generally have good accuracy in estimating monthly extreme temperatures across Iran. In most stations, the monthly extreme values of the ERA5-Land data are often underestimated compared to observational data. The correlation coefficients for the three indices TXx, TXn, and TNx, are all greater than 0.85 across all stations; however, for the TNn index, some stations in cluster four (very hot cluster), including Ahvaz, Bostan, and Abadan, exhibit very low correlation coefficients. Therefore, it can be concluded that the ERA5-Land reanalysis data can accurately estimate the trends of TXx, TXn, and TNx at all stations, but using these reanalysis data for the TNn index in the southwest region is not appropriate. The Nash coefficient values for most stations are acceptable, although in some cases, this value has turned negative, indicating that the use of ERA5-Land reanalysis data is not suitable for estimating the desired index. Using the average value of observational data as an estimate yields higher accuracy than that of the reanalysis data. The Nash coefficient for the TXx index is negative at Yasuj, Konarak, and Chabahar stations, for the TNx index at Kerman station, and for the TNn index at Safiabad, Bostan, Ahvaz, Masjed Soleiman, Ramhormoz, Abadan, Kerman, and Minab stations. The KGE index, which simultaneously measures mean bias, variance bias, and correlation, shows acceptable values for estimating TXx, TXn, and, TNx at all stations (greater than 0.55, 0.49, and 0.33, respectively). However, for estimating the TNn index, the KGE is negative at 37 stations, most of which are in clusters one and two. The analysis of KGE values revealed that the negativity arises from the bias in the mean of the reanalysis data compared to the mean of the observational data. Therefore, ERA5-Land data should be used with caution for estimating TNn in stations located in the northwest and northeast regions. Overall, the accuracy of the reanalysis data in estimating monthly extreme temperature indices varies across different regions of Iran based on the index in question. The estimation of TXx from the reanalysis data shows the highest accuracy in the warm cluster and the lowest in the coastal warm cluster, whereas ERA5-Land data shows the best accuracy for estimating TNx in the coastal warm cluster and the lowest accuracy in the very cold cluster. For the TXn index, the highest accuracy is observed in the warm cluster and the lowest in the very cold cluster, while the results for the TNn index indicate that the estimation accuracy is highest in the temperate humid cluster and very low in the very warm cluster.







Keywords: ERA5-Land, Iran, Monthly Extreme Temperature Indices

کلیدواژه‌ها English

ERA5-Land
Iran
Monthly Extreme Temperature Indices
  • Acharya, N., Faniriantsoa, R., Rashid, B., Sultana, R., Montes, C., Dinku, T. and Hassan, S.M.Q., 2020: Developing High-resolution Gridded Rainfall and Temperature Data for Bangladesh: the ENACTS-BMD dataset: doi: 10. 20944.preprints202012. 0468.v1.
  • Barbosa, S. and Scotto, M.G., 2022: Extreme heat events in the Iberia Peninsula from extreme value  mixture modeling of ERA5-Land air temperature, Weather and Climate Extremes, 36, 100448.
  • Beck, H.E., Pan, M., Roy, T., Weedon, G.P., Pappenberger, F., Van Dijk, A.I., Huffman, G.J., Adler, R.F. and Wood, E.F., 2019: Daily evaluation of 26 precipitation datasets using Stage-IV gauge-radar data for the CONUS, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 23(1), 207-224.
  • Cao, B., Gruber, S., Zheng, D. and Li, X., 2020: The ERA5-Land soil temperature bias in permafrost regions, The Cryosphere, 14(8), 2581-2595.
  • European center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), 2013: European centre for MediumRange Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) 2005, User Guide.
  • Gatien, P., Arsenault, R., Martel, J.L. and St-Hilaire, A., 2022: Using the ERA5 and ERA5-Land reanalysis datasets for river water temperature modelling in a data-scarce region, Canadian Water Resources Journal.Revue Canadienne Des Ressources Hydriques, 1-18.
  • Guijarro, J. A., 2018: Homogenization of climatic series with Climatol, https: CRAN.R-project.org.package=climatol.
  • Gupta, H.V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K.K. and Martinez, G.F., 2009: Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria, Implications for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of hydrology, 377(1-2), 80-91.
  • -Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horanyi, A., Munoz‐Sabater, J. and Thepaut, J.N., 2020. The ERA5 global reanalysis.
  • Izadi, N., Karakani, E.G., Saadatabadi, A.R., Shamsipour, A., Fattahi, E. and Habibi, M., 2021, Evaluation of ERA5 Precipitation Accuracy Based on Various Time Scales over Iran during 2000–2018, Water, 13(18), 2538.
  • Karaman, C.H. and Akyurek, Z., 2023.Evaluation of near-surface air temperature reanalysis datasets and downscaling with machine learning based Random Forest method for complex terrain of Turkey. Advances in Space Research, v. 71(12), p. 5256-5281.
  • Munoz, E. Alvarez, C. Billib, M. Arumi, J. and Rivera, D., 2011: Comparison of Gridded and Measured Rainfall Data for Basin-scale Hydrological Studies, Chilean journal of agricultural research. 71(3): 459-468.
  • -Mohammadi Ghaleni, M. and Sharafi, S., 2022. Evaluation of CRU TS4.05 and ERA5 Datasets Accuracy to Precipitation, Temperature and Potential Evapotranspiration in Different Climates across Iran. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, v. 16, p. 879-890 (in Persian).
  • Munoz-Sabater, J., Dutra, E., Agusti-Panareda, A., Albergel, C., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G. and Thepaut, J.N., 2021. ERA5-Land: A state-of- the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications. Earth system science data, v.13(9), p. 4349-4383.
  • Syed, Z., Ahmad, S., Dahri, Z.H., Azmat, M., Shoaib, M., Inam, A. and Ahmad, S., 2022.Hydroclimatology of the Chitral River in theIndus Basin under changing climate, Atmosphere, v. 13, p. 295.
  • Sheridan, S.C., Lee, C.C. and Smith, E.T.,2020. A comparison between station observations and reanalysis data in the identification of extreme temperature events, Geophysical Research Letters, v. 47(15), p. e2020GL088120.
  • Tarek, M., Brissette, F.P. and Arsenault, R., 2020: Evaluation of the ERA5 reanalysis as a potential reference dataset for hydrological modelling over North America: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24(5), 2527-2544.
  • ‏Velikou, K., Lazoglou, G., Tolika, K. and Anagnostopoulou, C., 2022: Reliability of the ERA5 in replicating mean and extreme temperatures across Europe, Water, 14(4), p.543.
  • -Vitolo, C., Di Giuseppe, F., Barnard, C., Coughlan, R., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Liberta, G. and Krzeminski, B., 2020. ERA5-based global meteorological wildfire danger maps, Scientific data, v. 7, p. 216.
  • Yilmaz, M., 2023: Accuracy assessment of temperature trends from ERA5 and ERA5-Land. Science of The Total Environment, 856. 159182. 10.1016.j. scitotenv.2022.159182.
  • Zhao, Peng & He, Zhibin, 2022: A First Evaluation of ERA5-Land Reanalysis Temperature Product Over the Chinese Qilian Mountains. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10. 907730. 10.3389.feart.2022.907730.
  • Zou, J., Lu, N., Jiang, H., Qin, J., Yao, L., Xin, Y. and Su, F., 2022: Performance of air temperature from ERA5-Land reanalysis in coastal urban agglomeration of Southeast China. Science of The Total Environment, 828, 154459.
  • Zhao, Peng & He, Zhibin, 2022: A First Evaluation of ERA5-Land Reanalysis Temperature Product Over the Chinese Qilian Mountains. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10. 907730. 10.3389.feart.2022.907730.
  • Ahmadi, M., Ahmadi, H., & Dadashi Roudbari, A. (2019). Monitoring the trend of monthly temperature in Iran based on the output of the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ERA Interim database. Geography, 7(60), 86-103.

 

  • Javanshiry, Z., Asadi Oskoei, A., Flamarzi, Y., & Abbasi, F. (2022). Evaluating the accuracy of reanalysis data from global climate databases CFS-v2, MERRA-2, ERA-5 for estimating average temperature in different regions of the country. Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 16(2), 1-24.
  • Sam Khaniani, A., & Mohammadi, S. A. (2022). Comparison of ERA5-Land reanalysis data with ground observations in Iran. Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 16(1), 195-212.
  • Gholami, S., Farajzadeh, M., & Ghavidel Rahimi, Y. (2023). A Comparative Study of the Performance of CHIRPS and ERA5Land Databases in Detecting Droughts in Iran. Physical Geography Research, (61), 1-22.

Heydari, A., Zarrin, A., & Dadashi Roudbari, A. (2023). 'Investigating the efficiency of definite and probabilistic versions (multi-member ensemble) of ERA5 dataset in estimating the temperature of Iran'. Journal of Geosciences Research, 14(4), 1-20.