پژوهش های اقلیم شناسی

پژوهش های اقلیم شناسی

تحلیل پارامترهای هواشناسی با استفاده از مدل گردش عمومی جو CMIP6 (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان پلدختر-لرستان)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد خرم آباد.،ایران
2 گروه مهندسی آب، واحد اراک، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ،اراک،ایران.
10.22034/jcr.2025.531695.1705
چکیده
آگاهی از تغییرپذیری مکانی-زمانی، دما و بارش، و همچنین پیش‌بینی‌های آتی آن‌ها، برای ارزیابی خطرات زیست‌محیطی و برنامه‌ریزی برای کاهش و سازگاری بلندمدت ضروری است. در این مطالعه، از مدل‌های گردش عمومی MPI-ESM1-2-LR و BCC-CSM2-MR، تحت دو سناریوی مسیرهای اجتماعی-اقتصادی مشترک SSP1-2.6 و SSP5-8.5، برای پیش‌بینی حداقل و حداکثر دمای هوا و بارش در شهرستان پلدختر واقع در استان لرستان استفاده شده است.بمنظور شبیه سازی پارامترهای هواشناسی از داده دما و بارش ثبت‌ شده طی‌ سالهای‌ 1992تا 2023 استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که‌ Can ESM5.0 در شبیه سازی پارامتر دما عملکرد مطلوبی داشته اما در پارامتر بارش توانایی کمتری دارد. نتایج حاصل از پیش بینی نوسانات بارش و دما نشان داد دل BCC-CSM2-MR بارش بسیار بالاتری را در ماه‌های ژوئن تا اکتبر پیش‌بینی می‌کند، در حالی که سناریوی ssp585 به طور کلی منجر به دماهای بالاتری نسبت به ssp126 می‌شود. همچنین نتایج نشان داد افزایش دما در تمام سناریوهای مورد بررسی به خصوص در سناریوهای با انتشار بالاتر (ssp585)، و تفاوت‌های قابل توجهی در پیش‌بینی بارش بین مدل‌ها وجود دارد این نتایج بر چالش‌های اقلیمی پیش‌رو و لزوم برنامه‌ریزی برای سازگاری تأکید می‌کنند.در مجموع نتایج‌ این پژوهش می‌تواند به‌ مدیریت‌ منابع‌ آب در آینده، ایجاد برنامه‌هایی‌ موثر برای‌ مقابله‌ با تغییرات اقلیمی‌ و زمینه‌ را برای‌ تصمیم‌گیری‌ آگاهانه‌ و برنامه‌ریزی‌ مناسب‌ آماده نماید.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Meteorological Parameter Analysis Using the CMIP6 General Circulation Model (Case Study: Poldokhtar County, Lorestan)

نویسندگان English

hamidreza babaali 1
reza jafarinia 2
gholamreza goodarzi 2
Hamid Tavakoli 2
1 Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad branch, Khorramabad, Iran
2 Department of Water engineering, Ar.c., Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction

Nowadays, due to the severe impacts of climate change and global warming on the structure and function of various ecosystems and production systems, the most concerning disruptions caused by human activities are for modern society . Natural and human activities lead to the warming of the Earth's surface and, consequently, an increase in greenhouse gas concentrations. However, climate change has been exacerbated since the 1970s, particularly due to fossil fuel consumption, population growth, industrialization, deforestation, extensive agriculture, and land-use changes by humans . The direct impacts of climate change include numerous phenomena. One consequence of climate change is rising temperatures and precipitation variability, which are accompanied by an increase in extreme weather events such as droughts, floods, hailstorms, heatwaves, sea-level rise, cold waves, and wildfires. In recent decades, General Circulation Models (GCMs) have been used to predict climate change impacts on various systems, including water resources and more.

Therefore, this research investigates the effects of climate change on temperature and precipitation parameters using CMIP6 climate models in Poldokhtar County, located in Lorestan Province. The study utilizes data from the CanESM5 predictor model and the Lars-WG downscaling model, based on emission scenarios developed for the baseline period (1992-2022), to forecast future atmospheric conditions. Two scenarios - the optimistic SSP1-2.6 and pessimistic SSP5-8.5 - will be examined for a near-future twenty-year period spanning 2023 to 2043.



Materials and methods

First, meteorological data for Poldokhtar County were obtained from the Lorestan Province Meteorological Organization. Then, by collecting observational time series data of daily temperature and precipitation over a 30-year baseline period (1992–2023), their characteristics and trends were examined, and statistical tests were performed on the two parameters (temperature and precipitation) to analyze them. Next, by referring to available databases related to the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), a General Circulation Model (GCM) was selected, and time series data generated by different models were retrieved. The projected climate data from these models for Lorestan Province were accessible based on the specified longitude and latitude range. To achieve the objectives of this study, historical climate data from the CanESM2.0 model in NetCDF format (daily and monthly scales) were downloaded from climate data portals. For statistical processing, the data were converted to Excel format using ArcMap software. The performance capability of the selected model in simulating temperature and precipitation parameters during the baseline period was evaluated using the model's historical data. In the next stage, the required future climate data were statistically downscaled and projected using the LARS-WG software environment for the CanESM5.0 model, based on the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), for two future 20-year periods (2020–2050).

Results and Discussion

Results indicated that both examined GCM models project an increase in minimum and maximum temperatures during the future period (2020–2049) compared to the baseline (1990–2019). According to the SSP results, both maximum and minimum temperatures increased under both the pessimistic (high-emission SSP5-8.5) and optimistic (SSP1-2.6) scenarios, with nearly identical magnitudes. However, precipitation declined more sharply under the pessimistic scenario (SSP5-8.5) compared to the low-emission (optimistic) scenario. Overall, the SSP5-8.5 scenario (higher emissions) led to higher projected temperatures than the SSP1-2.6 scenario (lower emissions), with this difference being particularly pronounced during warmer months. The models also exhibited divergence in precipitation projections, though a general declining trend in rainfall under the high-emission scenario (SSP5-8.5) was consistent across both models. This reduction in precipitation was especially evident during summer months, suggesting an elevated risk of drought in the region.

Conclusion

The model performance evaluation results demonstrated that CanESM5.0 can accurately simulate maximum and minimum temperature parameters, but shows greater error in simulating precipitation compared to the other two parameters. The temperature change results revealed that the studied county is affected by global warming during the examined period, with temperature changes indicating increases during 2020-2050 under both SSP126 and SSP585 scenarios. The precipitation and temperature variability prediction results showed that the BCC-CSM2-MR model predicts significantly higher precipitation from June to October, while the SSP585 scenario generally results in higher temperatures compared to SSP126. Furthermore, the results indicated temperature increases across all examined scenarios, particularly in higher emission scenarios (SSP585), along with significant differences in precipitation predictions among models. These reports serve as reliable resources for organizations, policymakers, and the scientific community to make appropriate decisions regarding climate change impact management and mitigation.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Climate Change
Poldokhtar
Simulation
General Atmospheric Circulation Model
1-       Annan, J.D. and Hargreaves, J.C. 2011. Understanding the CMIP3 Multimodel Ensemble. J. Climate, 24: 4529–4538.
2-       Ashraf, S., Nazemi, A., AghaKouchak, A. 2021. Anthropogenic drought dominates groundwater depletion in Iran. Sci Rep 11(1):1–10
3-       Bustos DF, Torres RR, Rodríguez L, Castillo M, Bourrel L (2024) Observation and Projection of Marine heatwaves in the Caribbean Sea from CMIP6 models. Remote Sens 16(13). https://doi.org/10. 3390/rs16132357
4-       Cruz González, A., Arteaga-Ramirez, R., Soria-Ruiz, J. Sanchez Cohen, I., Monterroso Rivas, A.I. and Quevedo, A. 2025. Climate change projections in temperature and precipitation using cmip6 in Central Mexico. Theoretical and Applied Climatology.
5-       Cruz-González A, Sánchez-Cohen I, Macías-Corral MA, Velásquez- Valle MA, Trejo-Calzada R (2021) Hydrologic modeling to measure the impact of climate change in the Yaqui River basin. Ingeniería Agrícola y Biosistemas 13(1):77–94. https://doi.org/ 10.5154/r.inagbi.2021.02.040
6-       Dehghani, R., Totabi Poudeh, H., Izadi, Z. 2022.The effect of climate change on groundwater level and its prediction using modern meta-heuristic model. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 16(3), 822-845
7-       Fazeli Khiavi, A., Salahi, B., & Goodarzi, M. (2020). Assessment effects of climate change on changes in potential evapotranspiration in the Moghan Plain by RCPs. Watershed. Eng. Manage., 12(4), 977-993. DOI: 10.22092/ijwmse.2019.126245.1649
8-       Feyissa, T.A., Demissie, T.A., Saathoff, F. and Gebissa, A. 2024. Hydrological responses projection to the potential impact of climate change under CMIP6 models scenarios in Omo River Basin, Ethiopia, Results in Engineering, Volume 23, 102708.
9-       Ghazi, B., Dutt, S., Torabi Haghighi, A. 2023. Projection of future meteorological droughts in Lake Urmia Basin. Iran Water 15(8):1558
10-   Hashemi, S., Khosravi, M., Tavousi, T. 2015. Simulating the Longest Length of Dry Spells with Approach of Climate Change in Iran. Arid Regions Geographic Studies, 6(22), 18-33.
11-   Hosseini, R., Takemura, A. and Hosseini, A. (2015a) Non-linear time-varying stochastic models for agroclimate risk assessment. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 22(2):227–246.
12-   IPCC. 2021. Climate change 2021 the physical science basis, AR6, Summary for policymakers. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/.
13-   Irwin, S.E., et al., 2012. Assessment of Climatic Vulnerability in the Upper Thames River Basin: Downscaling with LARS-WG. Water Resources Research Report. The University of Western Ontario, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
14-   Jahangir, M.H., Haghighi. P., Danehkar. Sh., 2022. Downscaling climate parameters in Fars's province, using models of the fifth report and RCP scenarios. Ecological Informatics 68 (2022) 101558. journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolinf.
15-   Jones, B., Neill, B.C.O. 2016. Spatially explicit global population scenarios consistent with the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 1–10. https:// doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/084003.
16-   Kamruzzaman M, Wahid S, Shahid S, Alam E, Mainuddin M, Islam HMT, Cho J, Rahman MM, Chandra J, Thorp KR (2023) Pre- dicted changes in future precipitation and air temperature across Bangladesh using CMIP6 GCMs. Heliyon 9(5): e16274. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon. 2023.e16274.
17-   Khan SF, Naeem UA (2023) Future climate projections using the LARS-WG6 downscaling model over Upper Indus Basin, Paki- stan. Environ Monit Assess 195(7). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10661-023-11419-y.
 
18-   Kouman, K. D., Komlavi, A., Kouadio, B.H., Kabo-bah, A.T., Moctar, D., Siabi, E.K. and Mensah, J.K. 2024. Assessment of climate change in the North-East Region of Côte d’Ivoire: future precipitation, temperature, and meteorological drought using CMIP6 models. Cogent Engineering, 11(1): 2345506
19-   Kriegler, E., Lamarque, J.F., Lowe, J., Meehl, G.A., Moss, R., Riahi, K. and Sanderson, B.M. 2016. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev. 9: 3461– 3482.
20-   Nateghi, S., Rafiiei sardooi, E., Azareh, A., and Soleimani Sardoo, F. (2022). Predicting future changes in potential evapotranspiration based on RCP scenarios in Halilrood Watershed. Watershed Eng. Manage., 13(4), 769-780. DOI: 10.22092/ijwmse.2021.353294.1874
21-   O’Neill, B., Kriegler, E., Ebi, K., Kemp-Benedict, E., Riahi, K., Rothman, D., Van Ruijven, B., Van Vuuren, D., Birkmann, J., Kok, K., Levy. and Solecki, W. 2017. The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Global Environmental Change, 42(1): 169-180.
22-   Riahi, K., Van Vuuren, D. P., Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., O’neill, B. C., Fujimori, S., Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Dellink, R., Fricko, O., & Lutz, W. (2017). The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Global Environ. Change, 42, 68-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009.