پژوهش های اقلیم شناسی

پژوهش های اقلیم شناسی

بررسی نمایه‌های حدی دما و بارش تحت شرایط تغییر اقلیم در استان خراسان رضوی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری آب و هواشناسی، گرایش اقلیم شناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد نور، نور، ایران
2 دانشیار، آب و هواشناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد نور، نور، ایران
3 استادیار- بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خراسان رضوی سازمان تحقیقات اموزش و ترویج کشاورزی
4 استادیار، پژوهشگاه هواشناسی و علوم جو پژوهشکده اقلیم شناسی و تغییر اقلیم مشهد، مشهد، ایران
چکیده
رویدادهای حدی تأثیر شدیدی بر سلامت انسان، اکولوژی، تنوع زیستی و اقتصاد دارند؛ بنابراین تحلیل و پیش‌بینی رفتار رویدادهای حدی از اهمیت بالایی برخوردار است. مدل‌های گردش عمومی (GCMs) به طور گسترده برای شبیه‌سازی وضعیت آب و هوای گذشته و پیش‌بینی آب و هوای آینده استفاده می‌شوند. هدف این تحقیق بررسی نمایه‌های حدی دما و بارش در ایستگاه‌های منتخب استان خراسان رضوی بود. بدین منظور سه ایستگاه قوچان، سبزوار و کاشمر انتخاب و 17 نمایه حدی شامل نمایه‌های میانگین، مطلق، طول دوره و روز با استفاده از مدل‌های CMIP6 مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. برای صحت‌سنجی نتایج مدل از سه روش ریشه میانگین مربع خطا (RMSE)، میانگین اریبی خطا (MBE) و درصد اریبی (PBIAS) استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که MPI-ESM-HR ریزمقیاس شده با مدل CMhyd مدلی بهینه در برآورد دما و بارش است. بطور کلی، این مدل در برآورد دما و بارش دارای بیش‌برآوردی است. بررسی نمایه‌های حدی دما طی دوره تاریخی (2014-1990) نشان داد که نمایه‌های WSDI، TMm، TNm، TNx، TXm و TXx دارای روند افزایشی معنی‌دار در سطح 05/0 هستند و به همین ترتیب نمایه روزهای یخبندان (FD) دارای روند کاهشی معنادار در سطح 05/0 است. پیش‌نگری نمایه‌های حدی دما و بارش تحت دو سناریو SSP2-4.5 و SSP5-8.5 در دوره‌های آینده نزدیک (2050-2026)، آینده میانی (2051-2075) و آینده دور (2100-2076) نشان داد که نمایه‌های حدی دما با شدت بیشتری نسبت به نمایه‌های بارشی در آینده تغییر خواهند کرد و این تغییر نیز افزایشی خواهد بود. همچنین نتایج نشان داد در هر سه ایستگاه مورد بررسی در استان خراسان رضوی نمایه‌های شدت بارش روزانه (SDII) و بیشینه بارش یک روزه (RX1day) در تمامی دوره‌های مورد بررسی روند افزایشی خواهد داشت که این نتیجه نشان می‌دهد که در دوره‌های آتی بارش‌های سیل‌آسا در سطح استان روند افزایشی خواهند داشت.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Examining the Climate Extreme Indices of temperature and precipitation under the conditions of climate change in Razavi Khorasan province

نویسندگان English

ali asgharzadeh 1
Gholamreza gobadijanbaz 2
Sadroddin Motevalli 2
majid taherian 3
Mansoureh Kouhi 4
1 Ph.D. Student of Climatology - Nour Branch, Islamic Azad University
2 Associate Professor of Hydrology and Meteorology Department Nour Branch, Islamic Azad University, Nour, Iran
3 Assistant Professor of Khorasan Razavi Research and Education Center for Agriculture and Natural Resources
4 Assistant Professor of the Research Institute of Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences, Research Institute of Climatology and Climate Change
چکیده English

Introduction:

Climate change is the long-term changes in the average conditions of the atmosphere, oceans and land surface, such as temperature, precipitation, wind, etc. Climate change can be caused by natural factors, such as changes in the sun's activity, volcanic eruptions, or orbital changes, or human factors, such as greenhouse gas emissions, land use changes, or air pollution. Therefore, the main problem of this research is to examine the combination of temperature and precipitation limit profiles at the level of Razavi Khorasan province.

Materials and methods:

The study area of this paper is Razavi Khorasan province located in the northeast of Iran. Razavi Khorasan province is located between 56°19' to 61°16' east longitude and 33°52' to 37°42' north latitude, from the north to the country of Turkmenistan, from the east to Afghanistan, from the west and north The west is limited to the provinces of North Khorasan, Semnan and Yazd, and the south and southwest are limited to the provinces of South Khorasan and Yazd.

The data used are from three synoptic stations of Qochan, Sabzevar and Kashmer for the period 1990 to 2014 for temperature and precipitation variables.

Coupled models of the Sixth Phase Intercomparison Project (CMIP6):

The output of the sixth phase or CMIP6 models under common socio-economic scenarios (SSPs) along with the representative scenarios of greenhouse gas concentrations on the analysis of feedbacks between climate changes and socio-economic factors such as global population growth, economic development and technological advances in are available In this research, MPI-ESM-HR model scaled with CMhyd model is used. Two intermediate (SSP2-4.5) and pessimistic (SSP5-8.5) scenarios have been used to examine  extreme climate indices of temperature and precipitation for three periods: the near future (2026-2050), the middle future (2025-2075), and the far future (2076-2100).

Validation of temperature and precipitation of CMIP6 models:

In this research, three statistics include root mean square error (RMSE), mean bias error (MBE) and percentage bias (PBIAS)  were used to validate the model results against station data. Positive values indicate overestimation and negative values indicate underestimation of the model. The RMSE method has been used to check the error. A value close to zero in this method indicates the optimality of the model.

Results and discussion:

The results showed that the MPI-ESM-HR model of the CMIP6 model series estimates the temperature more accurately than the precipitation in Razavi Khorasan province. The minimum deviation for temperature in Kashmer station was obtained with a value of 0.33 degrees Celsius and the maximum deviation was obtained with a value of 0.78 degrees Celsius in Sabzevar station. The value of the average temperature bias in Selane scale for Qochan station is also calculated as 0.51 degrees Celsius. The investigation of the bias method shows that the model has an overestimation in temperature estimation in selected stations of Razavi Khorasan province. The value of RMSE also varies between 0.87 in Kashmehr station and 1.20 in Sabzevar station among the investigated stations.

Investigating the trend of climate extreme indices of temperature and precipitation:

The results have shown that the highest number of consecutive dry days (CDD) is seen in Kashmer station with 158 days and the lowest in Qochan station with 67 days per year. In the same way, the highest consecutive wet days (CWD) in Qochan with 7.5 days per year and the lowest consecutive wet days with 5.7 days have been obtained in Kashmer station. The Prcptot index, which shows the amount of precipitation on days with more than 1 mm of precipitation, also has a decreasing trend from north to south in the province. The highest value of this index is seen in Qochan station with 238.9 mm and the lowest value with 138.9 mm in Kashmer station.

The average temperature (TMm) in the three investigated stations was calculated as 12.19, 15.72 and 18.29 degrees Celsius in Qochan, Sabzevar and Kashmer, respectively. For the maximum temperature values of 18.88, 22.18 and 24.74 degrees Celsius have been calculated for these station respectively. Among the selected climate extreme indices, five extreme indices of temperature include TMm, TNm, TNx, TXm and TXx in all three studied stations had a significant increasing trend at the level of 0.05. The result shows that frosty days are affected by the global warming phenomenon in The level of Khorasan Razavi province has recorded a decreasing trend during the last three decades.

projecting the extreme  temperature and precipitation indices under the  SSP2-4.5 scenario, the result showed that under the conditions of future climate change, the share of torrential rains and floods in the stations of the province will increase. The average temperature (TMm) in the province under the SSP2-4.5 scenario will increase by at least 1.39 degrees Celsius in the near future (2026-2050) at Qochan station and 3.04 degrees Celsius in the far future (2076-2100) at Kashmer station. The results related to the extreme climate indices clearly showed that global warming has caused a significant increase in  extreme temperature indices in Razavi Khorasan province. Also, the climate change has caused the rains to become torrential in the future and the intensity of the rains will increase.

Conclusion:

Examining the extreme temperature and precipitation indices under future climate change conditions has shown that temperature extreme indices will increase under both SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. The intensity of the increase under the pessimistic scenario of SSP5-8.5 is higher than the scenario of SSP2-4.5. Also, with the increase of the period, from the near future to the distant future, the abnormality of the selected extreme temperature indices increases. The analysis of extreme precipitation indices has also shown that the intensity of daily precipitation (SDII) and the maximum daily precipitation (RX1day) in all periods and scenarios in the studied stations have increasing anomalies. The increase of  precipitation has also been reported in previous researches, and frost days (FD) will also decrease in the future in all stations and scenarios. In general, the increase in frequency and intesity of extreme temperature and precipitation indices in the future can be a serious threat in the management of water resources and agriculture at the level of Razavi Khorasan Province, which is necessary to adopt the necessary plans in this field.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

extreme temperature and precipitation indices
climate change
CMhyd mode
Razavi Khorasan province
  1. Agyekum, J., Annor, T., Quansah, E., Lamptey, B., & Okafor, G. (2022). Extreme precipitation indices over the Volta Basin: CMIP6 model evaluation. Scientific African, 16, e01181.
  2. Alavinia, S. H., & Zarei, M. (2021). Analysis of spatial changes of extreme precipitation and temperature in Iran over a 50‐year period. International Journal of Climatology, 41, E2269-E2289.
  3. Caney, S. (2015). Climate change. In The Routledge handbook of global ethics (pp. 384-398). Routledge.
  4. Chai, T., & Draxler, R. R. (2014). Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE). Geoscientific model development discussions, 7(1), 1525-1534.
  5. Chamanehfar, S., Mousavi Baygi, M., babaeian, I., & Modaresi, F. (2022). Future projection for extreme indices of precipitation and temperature over the period 2026-2100 based on the output of CMIP6 models (Case study: Mashhad). Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 16(5), 963-976.
  6. Chen, H, Sun, J. Lin, W., & Xu, H. (2020). Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate extremes. Bull, 65(17), 1415-1418.
  7. Chetioui, C., & Bouregaa, T. (2024). Temperature and precipitation projections from CMIP6 for the Setif high plains in Northeast Algeria. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 17(2), 63.
  8. Ebrahimi, N., Zarrin, A., Mofidi, A., & Dadashi-Roudbari, A. (2023). Projected Precipitation Extremes in Lake Urmia Basin under Climate Change. Water and Soil, 37(5), 769-785. doi: 10.22067/jsw.2023.81891.1270.
  9. Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., & Taylor, K. E. (2016). Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geoscientific Model Development, 9(5), 1937-1958.
  10. FAO (2024). The State of the Global Climate and implications for food and agriculture, Available from: https://www.fao.org/climate-change/news/news-detail/the-state-of-the-global-climate-and-implications-for-food-and-agriculture/en.
  11. Fathian, F., Ghadami, M., Haghighi, P., Amini, M., Naderi, S., & Ghaedi, Z. (2020). Assessment of changes in climate extremes of temperature and precipitation over Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 141, 1119-1133.
  12. Gao, X., Guo, M., Yang, Z., Zhu, Q., Xu, Z., & Gao, K. (2020). Temperature dependence of extreme precipitation over mainland China. Journal of Hydrology, 583, 124595.
  13. Gusain, A., Ghosh, S., & Karmakar, S. (2020). Added value of CMIP6 over CMIP5 models in simulating Indian summer monsoon rainfall. Atmospheric Research, 232, 104680.
  14. Helali, J., Oskouei, E. A., Hosseini, S. A., Saeidi, V., & Modirian, R. (2022). Projection of changes in late spring frost based on CMIP6 models and SSP scenarios over cold regions of Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 149(3), 1405-1418.
  15. Kharin, V. V., Zwiers, F. W., Zhang, X., & Wehner, M. (2013). Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble. Climatic change, 119, 345-357.
  16. Kohi, M., & Babaeian, I. (2022). Projections of the Sea Level Rise and Sea Surface Temperature of Pars Sea Region Under SSPs Scenarios. Nivar, 46(116-117), 179-189. doi: 10.30467/nivar.2022.360864.1225.
  17. Kouhi, M., Babaeian, I., Mousavi –Baygi, M., Farid Hosseini, A. R., & Khazanedari, L. (2013). Projected Changes in Precipitation Extremes of Mashhad During the Twenty First Century. Iran-Water Resources Research, 9(1), 61-74.
  18. Kouhi, M., Fattahi, E., & Asadi Oskouei, E. (2022). Shifts in Planting Date and Change in Length of Growing Season in Yazd Province Under Warmer Climate Conditions. Nivar, 46(118-119), 55-72. doi: 10.30467/nivar.2023.361965.1226
  19. Kouzegaran, S., & Mousavi Baygi, M. (2015). Investigation of Meteorological Extreme Events in the North-East of Iran. Water and Soil, 29(3), 750-764. doi: 10.22067/jsw.v0i0.40845.
  20. Kurniadi, A., Weller, E., Salmond, J., & Aldrian, E. (2024). Future projections of extreme rainfall events in Indonesia. International Journal of Climatology, 44(1), 160-182.
  21. Kushwaha, P., Pandey, V. K., Kumar, P., & Sardana, D. (2024). CMIP6 Model Evaluation for Mean and Extreme Precipitation Over India. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 1-24.
  22. Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., & Wallis, J. R., (1994). Hydro-climatological trends in the continental United States, 1948-88. J Clim. 7(4), 586-607.
  23. Mahato, A. (2014). Climate change and its impact on agriculture. International journal of scientific and research publications, 4(4), 1-6.
  24. Mann, H. B., (1945). Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica: J. Econom, 245-259.
  25. Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S.L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M.I. and Huang, M. (2021). Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2.
  26. McLeod, A. I. (2005). Kendall rank correlation and Mann-Kendall trend test. R package Kendall, 602, 1-10.
  27. Meehl, G. A., Boer, G. J., Covey, C., Latif, M., & Stouffer, R. J. (2000). The coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 81(2), 313-318.
  28. Mishra, V., Wallace, J. M., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2012). Relationship between hourly extreme precipitation and local air temperature in the United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(16).
  29. Nishant, N., Di Virgilio, G., Ji, F., Tam, E., Beyer, K., & Riley, M. L. (2022). Evaluation of Present-Day CMIP6 Model Simulations of Extreme Precipitation and Temperature over the Australian Continent. Atmosphere, 13(9), 1478.
  30. Rahimzadeh, F., Asgari, A., & Fattahi, E. (2009). Variability of extreme temperature and precipitation in Iran during recent decades. International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 29(3), 329-343.
  31. Rao, K. K., Al Mandous, A., Al Ebri, M., Al Hameli, N., Rakib, M., & Al Kaabi, S. (2024). Future changes in the precipitation regime over the Arabian Peninsula with special emphasis on UAE: insights from NEX-GDDP CMIP6 model simulations. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 151.
  32. Soltani, M., Laux, P., Kunstmann, H., Stan, K., Sohrabi, M. M., Molanejad, M., ... & Martin, M. V. (2016). Assessment of climate variations in temperature and precipitation extreme events over Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 126, 775-795.
  33. Taghavi, F. (2010). Linkage between Climate Change and Extreme Events in Iran. Journal of the Earth and Space Physics, 36(2), -.
  34. Ukkola, A. M., De Kauwe, M. G., Roderick, M. L., Abramowitz, G., & Pitman, A. J. (2020). Robust future changes in meteorological drought in CMIP6 projections despite uncertainty in precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(11), e2020GL087820.
  35. Utsumi, N., Seto, S., Kanae, S., Maeda, E. E., & Oki, T. (2011). Does higher surface temperature intensify extreme precipitation?. Geophysical research letters, 38(16).
  36. Yan, Y., Wang, H., Li, G., Xia, J., Ge, F., Zeng, Q., Ren, X. and Tan, L. (2022). Projection of Future Extreme Precipitation in China Based on the CMIP6 from a Machine Learning Perspective. Remote Sensing, 14(16), 4033.
  37. Zarrin, A., & Dadashi-Roudbari, A. (2021). Drought Risk Management in a Changing Climate: The Role of National Policies and the Drought Management Plan (DMP). Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 8(1), 107-112.
  38. Zarrin, A., & Dadashi-Roudbari, A. (2022). Technical Note: Assessing the Effect of Climate Change on Heavy Precipitation in Iran Based on a CMIP6 Ensemble Model. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 8(4), 119-124.
  39. Zhang, X., Alexander, L., Hegerl, G.C., Jones, P., Tank, A.K., Peterson, T.C., Trewin, B. and Zwiers, F.W. (2011). Indices for monitoring changes in extremes based on daily temperature and precipitation data. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(6), 851-870.
  40. Zhao, Y., Qian, C., Zhang, W., He, D., & Qi, Y. (2021). Extreme temperature indices in Eurasia in a CMIP6 multi‐model ensemble: Evaluation and projection. International Journal of Climatology, 41(11), 5368-5385.
  41. Zhu, C., Yue, Q., & Huang, J. (2023). Projections of mean and extreme precipitation using the CMIP6 Model: A study of the Yangtze River Basin in China. Water, 15(17), 3043.
  42. Zhu, H., Jiang, Z., Li, J., Li, W., Sun, C., & Li, L. (2020). Does CMIP6 inspire more confidence in simulating climate extremes over China?. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 37, 1119-1132.