پژوهش های اقلیم شناسی

پژوهش های اقلیم شناسی

ارزیابی عملکرد مدل های CMIP6 در پیش نگری تغییرات دما و بارش در محدوده چاه نیمه های استان سیستان و بلوچستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه زمین شناسی، دانشکده علوم، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
2 استاد گروه زمین شناسی، دانشکده علوم، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
3 دانشجوی دکتری زمین شناسی مهندسی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
چکیده
دما و بارش به دلیل تغییرات قابل ملاحظه زمانی و مکانی از مهمترین متغیرهای اقلیمی در بررسی تغییرات اقلیمی هستند و پیش نگری تغییرات آن‌ها در برنامه‌ریزی‌ها و مخاطرات محیطی از اهمیت زیادی برخوردار است. لذا در این پژوهش به پیش نگری آینده تغییرات دما و بارش در محدوده چاه نیمه‌های استان سیستان و بلوچستان پرداخته شد. بدین منظور، 8 مدل گردش کلی جو (GCM) از CMIP6 با کاربست روش اصلاح اریبی مقیاس خطی (LSBC) با استفاده از سنجه‌های R2، MSE، RMSE و MAE مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. سپس تغییرات دما و بارش در دوره آینده (2050-2021) نسبت به دوره پایه (2014-1995) با استفاده از بهترین مدل تحت سه سناریوی SSP1-2.6، SSP3-7.0 و SSP5-8.5مورد بررسی و پیش‌نگری قرار گرفت. جهت آشکارسازی روند تغییرات دما و بارش در دوره پایه (2014-1995) نیز آزمون ناپارامتری من- کندال و تخمین‌گر شیب سن در مقیاس سالانه مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که بارش در منطقه مورد مطالعه دارای روند کاهشی و دما دارای روند افزایشی بوده است. نتایج حاصل از ارزیابی مدل‌های CMIP6 نشان داد که مدل‌های BCC_CSM2_MR و FGOALS-g3 به ترتیب با RMSE برابر با 94/0 و 6/5، بهترین و ضعیف‌ترین عملکرد را جهت شبیه‌سازی بارش در منطقه مورد مطالعه دارند. ارزیابی عملکرد مدل‌های مورد بررسی در شبیه‌سازی متوسط دما نیز نشان داد که مدل‌ MRI-ESM2-0 با RMSE برابر با 23/0 بهترین عملکرد و مدل CanESM5 با RMSE برابر با 33/0 ضعیف ترین عملکرد را دارند. نتایج حاصل از پیش‌نگری دما و بارش در منطقه مورد مطالعه نیز نشان داد که بارش در دوره آینده به طور متوسط به میزان 1/4 درصد نسبت به دوره مشاهداتی کاهش و دما به میزان 4/1 درجه سلسیوس افزایش پیدا خواهد کرد. همچنین سناریوهای SSP5-8.5 و SSP1-2.6 به ترتیب بیشترین و کمترین تغییرات دما و بارش را در منطقه مورد مطالعه نشان می دهند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Performance analysis of CMIP6 models in projection of temperature and precipitation changes in the Chahnimeh area of Sistan and Baluchistan province

نویسندگان English

Naser Hafezi Moghaddas 1
Gholamreza Lashkaripour 2
Rashid Parsaei 3
1 Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
2 Professor, Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
3 PhD student in engineering geology of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
چکیده English

Changes in temperature and precipitation are one of the most important debates in the field of environmental sciences. This phenomenon is very important because of its scientific and practical dimensions, because human systems dependent on climate elements such as water, agriculture, industries and the like are designed and operate on the basis of climate stability. Therefore, predicting and knowing about temperature and precipitation changes in the coming years can be a solution to problems such as drought, sudden floods, high evaporation and environmental destruction. The civilization of several thousand years of Sistan has been completely dependent on the flow of water in the Sistan River. Currently, the only source of water supply in the region is the flow of water in the Hirmand River and the water storage sources of Chahnimeh. Considering the dry climate of the region and the rainfall of about 50 mm per year and the presence of 120-day dry winds in Sistan and the lack of suitable underground water resources in the region, the Hirmand River and the Chahnimeh are the only source of water supply in the region. As a result, investigating climate changes and predicting changes in temperature and precipitation within the limits of these devices is very important to save Sistan. In this research, 8 GCM models from CMIP6 were evaluated according to their high resolution and available meteorological data, and after correcting the bias using the LSBC method, the performance of these models was evaluated in simulating the relevant parameters. The study was conducted in the basic period of these models (1990-2014). After receiving the data, the observational and historical parameter values for each of the studied stations were extracted by preparing a in the MATLAB environment using the closest GCMs grid in the base period (1995-2014). Then the bias correction method was used to correct the data. In the following, the difference between the values of observational and historical parameters was evaluated using different indices. After validating and evaluating the accuracy of different GCM models, using the best model, temperature and precipitation changes in the future periods were predicted under three different scenarios and its changes in the future period compared to the historical period (1995-2014) Was investigated. In order to reveal the trend of changes in temperature and precipitation, non-parametric Mann-Kendall test and Sen,s slope estimator were also investigated.

The results showed that the rainfall in Zabul and Zahak stations had a decreasing trend and this decreasing trend was not significant in any of the mentioned stations. Based on this, the decreasing trend of precipitation in the studied area is the type of short-term fluctuations of water and It is aerial. The highest decrease in precipitation is related to Zabul station with a gradient of -2.4. The trend of temperature also shows an increasing trend in both meteorological stations and this increasing trend is significant at the level of 5% in Zabul station. Examining the slope of temperature changes also shows that the highest slope of temperature changes is related to Zabul station with a slope of 0.07. After bias correction, the performance and accuracy of the models were evaluated in the simulation of the studied parameters using various indicators at the Zabul syndication station as the selected station of the region. The results showed that based on the RMSE index, BCC_CSM2_MR model and then MPI-ESM1-2-LR have higher accuracy than other models for simulating precipitation. The RMSE of the mentioned models with the observed rainfall data in the studied station on a monthly scale is equal to 0.94 and 0.95, respectively. FGOALS-g3 model also has the weakest performance among the investigated models for simulating precipitation in the study area with RMSE equal to 5.6. In general, based on various indicators of accuracy, the BCC_CSM2_MR model is suitable for simulating rainfall in the study area, so that its coefficient of determination is equal to 0.97, and its MSE and MAE values are lower than other models. The results of projection the rainfall in the future period (2021-2050) based on different scenarios show that based on each scenario, the amount of rainfall will decrease in both stations under study, and its amount is on average For Zabul station it is equal to 4.1% and for Zahak station it is equal to 4.2%. Overall, based on the average scenarios studied, the amount of precipitation in the study area will decrease by 1.4% compared to the observation period. The highest and lowest precipitation changes are estimated based on SSP5-8.5 and SSP1-2.6 scenarios, respectively. According to the average scenarios studied in the future period, the temperature in the study area will increase by 1.4 degrees Celsius compared to the observation period. The most changes in terms of stations are related to the drainage station with 5.9 percent. Also, scenarios SSP5-8.5 and SSP1-2.6 show the highest and lowest temperature changes in the studied area with 1.6 and 1.2 degrees Celsius, respectively. In general, according to the results of the CMIP6 model and the straw scale of the LSBC method, the amount of precipitation in the study area will decrease and the temperature will increase. to follow The totality of these conditions can cause a decrease in the storage and supply of water resources in the Chahnimeh, as a result of which the climatic conditions of the region will also change.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Projection"
Chahnimeh"
Temperature"
Precipitation"
"
SSP"
  • Abdelmoaty, H. M., Papalexiou, S.M. 2023. Changes of Extreme Precipitation in CMIP6 Projections: Should We Use Stationary or Nonstationary Models? Journal of Climate, 36 (9): 2999–3014.
  • Davidson, E.A., Janssens, I.A. 2006. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change, Nature. 440(7081), 165 p.
  • Ferreira, R N., Nissenbaum, M R., Rickenbach, TH M. 2018. Climate change effects on summertime precipitation organization in the Southeast United States. Atmospheric Research, 214: 348- 363.
  • Hejazizadeh, Z., Hosseini, S.A., Karbalaee, A., Poorkarim, R., Mousavi, S M. 2022. Spatiotemporal variations in precipitation extremes based on CMIP6 models and Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios over MENA. Arab J Geosci 15, 1601.
  • Heydari, Sh., Hosseini, S.A., Heydari, A. 2020. Investigating the effects of climate change on stream flows of Urmia Lake basin in Iran, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 1: 329-339.
  • Houerou, H.N.Le., Le Houerou, H.N. 1993. Climatic changes and Secheresse. 4: 95-111.
  • Hyun Cha, D., Kyou Lee, D., Chun-Sil Jin., Gayoung Kim., Yonghan Choi., Myoung-Seok Suh., Joong-Bae Ahn., Song-You Hong., Seung-Ki Min., Seong-Chan Park., Hyun-Suk Kang. 2016. Future changes in summer precipitation in regional climate simulations over the Korean Peninsula forced by multi-RCP scenarios of HadGEM2-AO. Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 52:139-149.
  • Jiang, J., Zhou, T., Chen, X., Zhang, L. 2020. Future changes in precipitation over Central Asia based on CMIP6 projections, Environ. Res. Lett, 15: 1-4.
  • Kay, AL., Davies, HN., Bell, VA., Jones, RG. 2009. Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impactsL flood frequency in England. Climate Change, 92: 41-63.
  • Kendall M.G., 1975, Rank Correlation Measures. Charles Griffin. London.
  • Leong Tan, M., LatifIbrahim,, Yusop, Z., Chua, V., WengChan, N. 2017. Climate change impacts under CMIP5 RCP scenarios on water resources of the Kelantan River Basin, Malaysia. Atmospheric Research, 189: 1-10.
  • Majdi, F., Hosseini, S.A., Karbalaee, A., Kaseri, M., Marjanian, S. 2022. Future projection of precipitation and temperature changes in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region based on CMIP6. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 147: 1249–1262.
  • Mann, H.B. 1945. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13:245–259
  • Mesgari, E., Hosseini, S A., Hemmesy, M S., Houshyar, M., Golzari Partoo, L. 2022. Assessment of CMIP6 models’ performances and projection of precipitation based on SSP scenarios over the MENAP region. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 13 (10): 3607–3619.
  • Nilawar, A P., Waikar, M L. 2019. Impacts of climate change on stream flow and sediment concentration under RCP 4.5 and 8.5: A case study in Purna river basin, India. Science of the Total Environment, 2: 2685-2696
  • Palmer, T. E., McSweeney, C. F., Booth, B. B. B., Priestley, M. D. K., Davini, P., Brunner, L., Borchert, L., Menary, M. B. 2023. Performance-based sub-selection of CMIP6 models for impact assessments in Europe, Earth Syst. Dynam., 14: 457–483.
  • Qin, J., Su, B., Tao, H., Wang, Y., Huang, j., Jiang, T. 2021. Projection of temperature and precipitation under SSPs-RCPs Scenarios over northwest China. Front. Earth Sci. 15: 23–37.
  • Salahi, B., Goudarzi, M.; Hosseini, S. A. 2015. Forecasting temperature and precipitation changes in the 2050s in the Urmia Lake watershed, Journal of Watershed Engineering and Management, No. 4, 425-438.
  • Samadi, A., Amini, R. 2020. Evaluating the rate of evaporation and the available solutions for its management in the Chahnimeh of Sistan and Baluchistan National Bodybuilding Conference, Zabul University, 15 p.
  • Sarkar, J., Chicholikar, J. R., Rathore, L. S. 2015. Predicting Future Changes in Temperature and Precipitation in Arid Climate of Kutch, Gujarat: Analyses Based on LARS-WG Model. Current science, 109: 2084-2093.
  • Sen, P.K (1968). Estimates of the regression coefficients based on Kendall’s tau. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63:1379–1389.
  • Shaimi, A., Habibi Nokhandan, M. 2009. Global warming and biological ecological consequences, first edition, Ferdowsi University Press, Mashhad.
  • Shrestha, S., Shrestha, M., Babel, M.S. 2016. Modelling the potential impacts of climate change on hydrology and water resources in the Indrawati River Basin, Nepal. Environ Earth Sci, 75, 280
  • Teutschbein, C., Seibert, J. 2012. Bias correction of regional climate model simulation for hydrological climate-change impact studies: Review and evaluation of different methods. J. Hydrology, 456: 12-29
  • Yue, Y., Yan, D., Yue, Q., Ji, G., Wang, Z. 2021. Future changes in precipitation and temperature over the Yangtze River Basin in China based on CMIP6 GCMs, Atmospheric Research, 264: 105828
  • Zahraei, A., Hosseini, S. A. 2019. Climate change and effects on water resources, Havar Publications, first edition, Ilam.
  • Zhahabiun, B., Goudarzi, M. R., Masah Bowani, A. 2010. Application of SWAT model in estimation of watershed runoff in future periods under the influence of climate change, Journal of Climatology Research, No. 1 2, pp. 43-58.
  • Zhang, X., Vincent, L.A., Hogg, W.D., Niitsoo, A. 2000. Temperature and rainfall trends in Canada during the 20th century. Atmosphere- Ocean, 38: 395-429.
دوره 1402، شماره 56
سال چهاردهم | شماره 56| زمستان 1402
تابستان 1403
صفحه 165-178