پژوهش های اقلیم شناسی

پژوهش های اقلیم شناسی

شبیه‌سازی‌ عددی غلظت ستونی گاز گلخانه‌ای CO2 روی ایران : اعتبار سنجی مدلWRF-GHG در برابرمشاهدات ماهواره گوست

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دکتری هواشناسی، دانشکده علوم و فنون دریایی،دانشگاه هرمزگان
2 استاد، علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، گروه علوم غیر زیستی جوی و اقیانوسی، دانشگاه هرمزگان
3 دکتری مهندسی صنایع، پژوهشکده هواشناسی
چکیده
به عنوان یکی از عوامل مهم گرمایش جهانی، غلظت CO2 و تغییرات آن حساسیت‌هایی را در سراسر جهان برانگیخته است. ایجاد درک صریح از توزیع مکانی و زمانی غلظت CO2 در مقیاس منطقه ای، یک چالش فنی حیاتی برای تحقیقات تغییرات آب و هوایی است. شبیه سازی عددی منطقه ای، از غلظت جوی CO2، با استفاده از مدل تحقیقات آب و هوا و پیش‌بینی-شیمی(WRF-GHG) انجام شد. اطلاعات XCO2 بازیابی شده از مشاهدات ماهواره گوست(GOSAT)، به ‌عنوان اطلاعات کنترل دقت و ارزیابی نتایج شبیه سازی شده در غلظت ستونی CO2 استفاده گردید. عملکرد شبیه‌سازی‌‌ها در پیش‌بینی غلظت گاز گلخانه‌ای کربن‌دی‌اکسید (CO2)، برای دوره مطالعاتی فوریه و اوت در سال 2010، نشان داد که تغییرپذیری مکانی و زمانی متغییرهای هواشناسی به خوبی برای دما، باد و رطوبت نسبی، شبیه‌سازی شده است. مهمترین منابع گسیل CO2 شامل، گسیل مصنوعی انسانی، گسیل زیست‌توده، گسیل آتش‌سوزی و گسیل اقیانوسی می-باشد. در بین منابع گسیل غلظت ستونیCO2 ، منابع انسانی، با مقدار (38.33 و 23.70) درصد در ماه فوریه و اوت بزرگترین سهم در گسیل این آلاینده را دارند. گسیل بایوژنیک ، بعد از گسیل انسانی، با مقدار (24.08 و 46.64) درصد جذب و (31.81 و 28.64) در ماه فوریه و اوت بزرگترین سهم در تولید و جذب این آلاینده را دارند. گسیل آتش‌سوزی و اقیانوسی برای آلاینده CO2، به ترتیب در سومین و چهارمین رتبه در سهم گسیل کلCO2 قرار دارند. از بررسی رفتار مقادیر میانگین ماهانه از میدان فرارفت، در هر دو ماه فوریه و اوت، روی ایران مشخص گردید که مقادیر ماکزیمم فرارفت CO2در ماه فوریه، شب هنگام تا اوایل صبح رخ داده‌است. این مطالعه نشان داد که مدلWRF-GHG قادر است به خوبی، بسیاری از ویژگی‌های مهم میدانهای متغییرهای جوی را در جنوب غربی آسیا (منطقه خاورمیانه-ایران) شبیهسازی نماید و استفاده از آن برای مطالعات آتی در این منطقه را اطمینان می‌دهد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Numerical simulation of column concentration of greenhouse gas CO2 over Iran: Validation of WRF-GHG model against GOSAT satellite observations

نویسندگان English

Samira Karbasi 1
Hossein Malakooti 2
Atefeh Mohammadi 3
1 Ph.D. candidate of Meteorology, Department of Marine and Atmospheric Science (non-Biologic), University of Hormozgan
2 Department of Marine and Atmospheric Science (non-Biologic), University of Hormozgan
3 Atmospheric Science and Meteorological Research Center (ASMERC)
چکیده English

The main greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) have a direct effect on the radiative balance of the atmosphere. They are the main driver of climate change, because their global average concentration during the industrial period has increased by about 47% and 156% for CO2 and CH4, respectively, as a result of human activities (IPCC, 2021).

The importance of these gases, henceforth called greenhouse gases (GHGs), led to the creation of global monitoring networks to monitor their trends and variability. Terrestrial remote sensing networks such as the Atmospheric Composition Change Detection Network (NDACC) and the Total Carbon Column Observation Network (TCCON) are used and welcomed by researchers due to the long time span of accurate column observations (De Mazière et al., 2018). ; Wunch et al., 2011).

Observational grid measurements of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometers use direct sunlight to measure the absorption of rare gases along the line of sight and provide detailed information on the total column abundance or vertical profile of greenhouse gases and other species. These observations are used by scientists around the world to detect changes in atmospheric composition, to improve our understanding of the carbon cycle, or to provide validation for space-based measurements. Recently, low-cost mobile FTIR spectrometers have been used in the Collaborative Carbon Column Observing Network (COCCON) to validate fluxes in urban areas (Hase et al., 2015; Vogel et al., 2019; Makarova et al., 2021).

In addition to FTIR observations, surface observations of these gases are performed for better management of springs and wells on a smaller scale. Both types of observations contain valuable information about the emission and atmospheric distribution of these species and complement each other. The need to estimate greenhouse gas emissions using independent approaches has encouraged scientists to develop policies based on different measurements (Dayalu et al., 2009).

One of the important factors of global warming, the concentration of CO2 and its changes has aroused sensitivities all over the world. Establishing a clear understanding of the spatial and temporal distribution of CO2 concentrations at a regional scale is a critical technical challenge for climate change research. Modeling with the spatial resolution of the CO2 atmospheric concentration was done using the Weather Research and Forecasting-Chemistry (WRF-GHG) model and from the X CO2 data retrieved from the GOSAT satellite observations, as accuracy control information and Evaluation of the simulated data was used in CO2 column concentration. WRF-GHG is a model for simulating atmospheric chemical transport, designed for regional studies of CO2 concentration. The studied area, the Middle East region was designed as the first domain and Iran as the second domain with a resolution of 30 and 10 km, respectively. The performance of the simulations in predicting the concentration of greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2), for the study period of February and August 2010, showed that the spatial and temporal variability of meteorological variables is well represented by the model with a correlation coefficient of 93%. -76%, 39%-47%, and 52-80% for temperature, wind, and relative humidity have been simulated.

The most important sources of CO2 emissions include man-made emissions, biomass emissions, fire emissions, and ocean emissions. Among the emission sources of CO2 column concentration, human resources have the largest share in the emission of this pollutant with the amount of (38.33 and 23.70) percent in February and August. Biogenic emissions, after human emissions, with (24.08 and 46.64) percentages of absorption and (31.81 and 28.64) in February and August have the largest share in the production and absorption of this pollutant. Fire emissions with (5.76 and 2.04) percent and ocean with a value of (3.23-10 x 6) percent for CO2 pollutants are in third and fourth place respectively in the share of total CO2 emissions. From the analysis of the behavior of monthly average values from the advection field, in both February and August, it was determined that the maximum values of advection occurred at night to early morning. The evaluation results of the RMSE error indicate that the simulation has performed better in the cold season than in the hot season in the aforementioned pollutant simulations. CO2 column concentration was underestimated in winter (0.79 ppmv) and overestimated in summer (0.45 ppmv). This study showed that the WRF-GHG model is able to represent well many important features of observations (such as temperature, wind field, and humidity) in Southwest Asia (Middle East-Iran region) and the use of the model for future studies in It assures the region.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Global warming
Carbon dioxide (CO2)
Advection
WRF-GHG model
GOSAT satellite
  1. Agusti-Panareda, A., Diamantakis, M., Bayona, V., Klappenbach, F., & Butz, A. (2017). Improving the inter-hemispheric gradient of total column atmospheric CO 2 and CH 4 in simulations with the ECMWF semi-Lagrangian atmospheric global model. Geoscientific Model Development, 10(1), 1-18.
  2. Bao, J.-W., Michelson, S. A., McKeen, S. A., and Grell, G. A. (2005), Meteorological evaluation of a weather-chemistry forecasting model using observations from the TEXAS AQS 2000 field experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D21105, doi: 10.1029/2004JD005024.
  3. Beck, V., Gerbig, C., Koch, T., Bela, M. M., Longo, K. M., Freitas, S. R., Kaplan, J. O., Prigent, C., Bergamaschi, P., and Heimann, M.: WRF-Chem simulations in the Amazon region during wet and dry season transitions: evaluation of methane models and wetland inundation maps, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7961–7982, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7961-2013, 2013.
  4. Crisp, D. CEOS Atmospheric Composition Virtual Constellation Greenhouse Gas Team. A constellation architecture for monitoring carbon dioxide and methane from space.
  5. Dayalu, A., Munger, J. W., Wang, Y., Wofsy, S. C., Zhao, Y., Nehrkorn, T., Nielsen, C., McElroy, M. B., and Chang, R.: Carbon dioxide emissions in Northern China based on atmospheric observations from 2005 to 2009, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-632, 2018.
  6. De Mazière, M., Thompson, A. M., Kurylo, M. J., Wild, J. D., Bernhard, G., Blumenstock, T., Braathen, G. O., Hannigan, J. W., Lambert, J.-C., Leblanc, T., McGee, T. J., Nedoluha, G., Petropavlovskikh, I., Seckmeyer, G., Simon, P. C., Steinbrecht, W., and Strahan, S. E.: The Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC): history, status and perspectives, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4935–4964, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4935-2018, 2018.
  7. Feng, S., Lauvaux, T., Newman, S., Rao, P., Ahmadov, R., Deng, A., Díaz-Isaac, L. I., Duren, R. M., Fischer, M. L., Gerbig, C., Gurney, K. R., Huang, J., Jeong, S., Li, Z., Miller, C. E., O’Keeffe, D., Patarasuk, R., Sander, S. P., Song, Y., Wong, K. W., and Yung, Y. L.: Los Angeles megacity: a high-resolution land– atmosphere modelling system for urban CO2 emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9019–9045, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp16-9019-2016, 2016.
  8. Grell, Georg A, Steven E Peckham, Rainer Schmitz, Stuart A McKeen, Gregory Frost, William C Skamarock, and Brian Eder. 2005. 'Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model', Atmospheric Environment, 39: 6957-75.
  9. Grell, Georg, and Alexander Baklanov. 2011. 'Integrated modeling for forecasting weather and air quality: A call for fully coupled approaches', Atmospheric Environment, 45: 6845-51.
  10. Guerlet, S, A Butz, D Schepers, S Basu, OP Hasekamp, A Kuze, T Yokota, J‐F Blavier, NM Deutscher, and DW T Griffith. 2013. 'Impact of aerosol and thin cirrus on retrieving and validating XCO2 from GOSAT shortwave infrared measurements', Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118: 4887-905.
  11. Hase, F., Frey, M., Blumenstock, T., Groß, J., Kiel, M., Kohlhepp, R., Mengistu Tsidu, G., Schäfer, K., Sha, M. K., and Orphal, J.: Application of portable FTIR spectrometers for detecting greenhouse gas emissions of the major city Berlin, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3059–3068, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3059-2015, 2015.
  12. Hu, X.-M., Crowell, S., Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Davis, K. J., Xue, M., Xiao, X., Moore, B., Wu, X., Choi, Y., and DiGangi, J. P.: Dynamical Downscaling of CO2 in 2016 Over the Contiguous United States Using WRF-VPRM, a WeatherBiosphere-Online-Coupled Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 12, e2019MS001875, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001875, 2020.
  13. Hu, Xiao-Ming, John W Nielsen-Gammon, and Fuqing Zhang. 2010. 'Evaluation of three planetary boundary layer schemes in the WRF model', Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 49: 1831-44.
  14. World Energy Outlook. 2008. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2008 (accessed on 4 November 2020).
  15. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007; p. 104.
  16. Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., ... & Zhou, B. (2021). Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2.Jamroensan, A.: Improving bottom-up and top-down estimates of carbon fluxes in the Midwestern USA, PhD thesis, University of Iowa, https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.99sd8cdc, 2013.
  17. Janjić, Zaviša I. 1994. 'The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes', Monthly weather review, 122: 927-45
  18. Kumar, Rajesh. 2012. 'Weather research and forecasting model with chemistry (WRF-CHEM) over South Asia', Hamburg University Hamburg.
  19. Karbasi, S., Malakooti, H., Rahnama, M., & Azadi, M. (2022). Study of CH4 column concentration on Iran: Application of GOSAT satellite observations and WRF-GHG numerical simulations. Journal of Climate Research, 1401(50), 1-22.
  20. Li, X., Hu, X.-M., Cai, C., Jia, Q., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Xue, M., Xu, J., Wen, R., and Crowell, S. M. R.: Terrestrial CO2 Fluxes, Concentrations, Sources and Budget in Northeast China: Observational and Modeling Studies, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031686, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031686, 2020.
  21. Liu, Y., Yue, T., Zhang, L., Zhao, N., Zhao, M., and Liu, Y.: Simulation and analysis of XCO2 in North China based on high accuracy surface modeling, Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 25, 27378– 27392, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2683-x, 2018
  22. Mahadevan, P., Wofsy, S. C., Matross, D. M., Xiao, X., Dunn, A. L., Lin, J. C., Gerbig, C., Munger, J. W., Chow, V. Y., and Gottlieb, E. W.: A satellite-based biosphere parameterization for net ecosystem CO2 exchange: V
  23. egetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (VPRM), Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB2005, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002735, 2008.
  24. Makarova, M. V., Alberti, C., Ionov, D. V., Hase, F., Foka, S. C., Blumenstock, T., Warneke, T., Virolainen, Y. A., Kostsov, V. S., Frey, M., Poberovskii, A. V., Timofeyev, Y. M., Paramonova, N. N., Volkova, K. A., Zaitsev, N. A., Biryukov, E. Y., Osipov, S. I., Makarov, B. K., Polyakov, A. V., Ivakhov, V. M., Imhasin, H. Kh., and Mikhailov, E. F.: Emission Monitoring Mobile Experiment (EMME): an overview and first results of the St. Petersburg megacity campaign 2019, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1047–1073, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1047-2021, 2021.
  25. Makarova, M.V.; Alberti, C.; Ionov, D.V.; Hase, F.; Foka, S.C.; Blumenstock, T.; Warneke, T.; Virolainen, Y.A.; Kostsov, V.S.; Frey, M.; et al. Emission Monitoring Mobile Experiment (EMME): An overview and first results of the St. Petersburg megacity campaign 2019. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2021, 14, 1047–1073. [CrossRef]
  26. Matsunaga, T.; Maksyutov, S. (Eds.) A Guidebook on the Use of Satellite Greenhouse Gases Observation Data to Evaluate and ImproveGreenhouse Gas Emission Inventories, 1st ed.; Satellite Observation Center, National Institute for Environmental Studies: Tsukuba,Japan, 2018; p. 129.
  27. Miao, Jin, Dongshu Guo, Jinzhe Zhang, Qingpei Huang, Genji Qin, Xin Zhang, Jianmin Wan, Hongya Gu, and Li-Jia Qu. 2013. 'Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system', Cell research, 23: 1233-36
  28. Misenis, Chris, and Yang Zhang. 2010. 'An examination of sensitivity of WRF/Chem predictions to physical parameterizations, horizontal grid spacing, and nesting options', Atmospheric Research, 97: 315-34.
  29. Mlawer, Eli J, Steven J Taubman, Patrick D Brown, Michael J Iacono, and Shepard A Clough. 1997. 'Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated‐k model for the longwave', Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 102: 16663-82.
  30. Monin, Andreĭ Sergeevich, and Aleksandr Mikhaĭlovich Obukhov. 1954. 'Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere', Contrib. Geophys. Inst. Acad. Sci. USSR, 151: e187.
  31. Park, C., Gerbig, C., Newman, S., Ahmadov, R., Feng, S., Gurney, K. R., Carmichael, G. R., Park, S.-Y., Lee, H.-W., Goulden, M., Stutz, J., Peischl, J., and Ryerson, T.: CO2 Transport, Variability, and Budget over the Southern California Air Basin Using the High-Resolution WRF-VPRM Model during the CalNex 2010 Campaign, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 57, 1337–1352, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0358.1, 2018.
  32. Park, C., Park, S.-Y., Gurney, K. R., Gerbig, C., DiGangi, J. P., Choi, Y., and Lee, H. W.: Numerical simulation of atmospheric CO2 concentration and flux over the Korean Peninsula using WRF- VPRM model during Korus-AQ 2016 campaign, PLoS ONE, 15, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228106, 2020.
  33. Parker, Robert, Hartmut Boesch, Austin Cogan, Annemarie Fraser, Liang Feng, Paul I Palmer, Janina Messerschmidt, Nicholas Deutscher, David WT Griffith, and Justus Notholt. 2011. 'Methane observations from the Greenhouse Gases Observing SATellite: Comparison to ground‐based TCCON data and model calculations', Geophysical Research Letters, 38
  34. Pillai, D., Buchwitz, M., Gerbig, C., Koch, T., Reuter, M., Bovensmann, H., Marshall, J., and Burrows, J. P.: Tracking city CO2 emissions from space using a high-resolution inverse modelling approach: a case study for Berlin, Germany, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9591–9610, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16- 9591-2016, 2016.
  35. Pillai, D., Gerbig, C., Marshall, J., Ahmadov, R., Kretschmer, R., Koch, T., and Karstens, U.: High resolution modeling of CO2 over Europe: implications for representation errors of satellite retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 83–94, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-83-2010, 2010
  36. S kamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Liu, Z., Berner, J., Wang, W., Powers, J. G., Duda, M. G., Barker, D., and Huang, X.-Y.: A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Model Version 4.3, Tech. rep., No. NCAR/TN-556+STR, NCAR/UCAR, https://doi.org/10.5065/1dfh-6p97, 2021.
  37. Skamarock, WC, JB Klemp, J Dudhia, DO Gill, DM Barker, MG Duda, XY Huang, W Wang, and JG Powers. 2008. "A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3, vol." In.: NCAR/TN–475+ STR of NCAR Technical Note, Mesoscale and Microscale.
  38. T imofeyev, Y.M.; Nerobelov, G.M.; Virolainen, Y.A.; Poberovskii, A.V.; Foka, S.C. Estimates of CO2 Anthropogenic Emission from the Megacity St. Petersburg. Dokl. Earth Sci. 2020, 494, 753–756. [CrossRef]
  39. Takahashi, Taro, Stewart C Sutherland, Rik Wanninkhof, Colm Sweeney, Richard A Feely, David W Chipman, Burke Hales, Gernot Friederich, Francisco Chavez, and Christopher Sabine. 2009. 'Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean pCO2, and net sea–air CO2 flux over the global oceans', Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 56: 554-77.
  40. Tramontana, Gianluca, Martin Jung, Christopher R Schwalm, Kazuhito Ichii, Gustau Camps-Valls, Botond Ráduly, Markus Reichstein, M Altaf Arain, Alessandro Cescatti, and Gerard Kiely. 2016. 'Predicting carbon dioxide and energy fluxes across global FLUXNET sites with regression algorithms', Biogeosciences, 13: 4291-313.
  41. Viatte, C.; Lauvaux, T.; Hedelius, J.K.; Parker, H.; Chen, J.; Jones, T.; Franklin, J.E.; Deng, A.J.; Gaudet, B.; Verhulst, K.; et al. Methane emissions from dairies in the Los Angeles Basin. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 17, 7509–7528. [CrossRef]
  42. Vogel, F. R., Frey, M., Staufer, J., Hase, F., Broquet, G., XuerefRemy, I., Chevallier, F., Ciais, P., Sha, M. K., Chelin, P., Jeseck, P., Janssen, C., Té, Y., Groß, J., Blumenstock, T., Tu, Q., and Orphal, J.: XCO2 in an emission hot-spot region: the COCCON Paris campaign 2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3271–3285, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3271-2019, 2019.
  43. Wunch, D., Toon, G. C., Blavier, J.-F. L., Washenfelder, R. A., Notholt, J., Connor, B. J., Griffith, D. W. T., Sherlock, V., and Wennberg, P. O.: The Total Carbon Column Observing Network, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 369, 2087–2112, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0240, 2011.
  44. Yokota, T, Y Yoshida, N Eguchi, Y Ota, T Tanaka, H Watanabe, and S Maksyutov. 2009. 'Global concentrations of CO2 and CH4 retrieved from GOSAT: First preliminary results', Sola, 5: 160-63.
  45. Yoshida, Y., Ota, Y., Eguchi, N., Kikuchi, N., Nobuta, K., Tran, H., . . . Yokota, T. (2011). Retrieval algorithm for CO 2 and CH 4 column abundances from short-wavelength infrared spectral observations by the Greenhouse gases observing satellite. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 4(4), 717-734.
  46. Zhang, RenHe, and XueShun Shen. 2008. 'On the development of the GRAPES—A new generation of the national operational NWP system in China', Chinese Science Bulletin, 53: 3429-32.
  47. Zhao, X., Marshall, J., Hachinger, S., Gerbig, C., Frey, M., Hase, F., and Chen, J.: Analysis of total column CO2 and CH4 measurements in Berlin with WRF-GHG, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11279–11302, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11279-2019, 2019.
  48. Zhao, X.; Marshall, J.; Hachinger, S.; Gerbig, C.; Frey, M.; Hase, F.; Chen, J. Analysis of total column CO2 and CH4 measurements in Berlin with WRF-GHG. Atmos. Chem