Journal of Climate Research

Journal of Climate Research

Assessing the Seasonal Anomaly of Iran Temperature under Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) Scenarios: A Study on the Efficiency of the MPI-ESM-LR Model

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Fatemeh Taghavinia 1
Batool Zeynali 2
Abbasali Dadashi-Roudbari 3
1 PhD student of Climatology, Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2 Professor of Climatology, Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
3 Postdoctoral Research Associate of Climatology, Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
10.22034/jcr.2025.201990
Abstract
Extended Abstract

Introduction

It is essential to disclose or evaluate the impacts of global warming and climate change on temperature in order to account for the climate variations in each given area, such as Iran. This research aimed to assess the effectiveness of the MPI-ESM-LR model, a part of the CMIP5 model series, in evaluating the seasonal anomaly of Iran's temperature. It addressed the lack of comprehensive studies on modeling and forecasting the effects of global warming on temperature events in Iran. This study focused on different Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) to provide a comprehensive analysis. It examined two time periods, including the historical eras (1980–2005) and the future (2021–2100). The analysis was done based on the CORDEX-WAS dynamical downscaling approach at the station size. The present study aimed to provide solutions to the following two questions: Is the described model, which utilizes the CORDEX dynamical downscaling approach, capable of accurately forecasting seasonal temperature fluctuations in Iran with little error? Will there be a rise in air temperature conditions on a seasonal scale in the future?

Materials and methods

Eight models, namely CanESM2, CSIRO-Mk3-6-0, GFDL-ESM2M, ICHEC-EC-EARTH, IPSL-CM5A-MR, MIROC-ESM, MPI-ESM-LR, and NorESM1-M, were examined to determine the optimum model for forecasting Iran's seasonal temperature. The verification findings of the preceding models indicate that the MPI-ESM-LR model exhibits the least bias, making it the most accurate model for forecasting Iran's seasonal temperature in future periods. To verify the accuracy of the air temperature data obtained from the MPI-ESM-LR model, a total of 49 synoptic stations were chosen across the country. This selection was made based on the historical data provided by the CORDEX project, covering the statistical period from 1980 to 2005. This study examined the effectiveness of the MPI-ESM-LR model, a collection of CMIP5 models, in assessing seasonal air temperature in Iran. It focused on three scenarios: RCP 2.6 (optimistic), RCP 4.5 (moderate), and RCP 8.5 (pessimistic). The research analyzed the seasonal temperature anomaly in Iran for three time periods: the near future (2021-2050), the middle future (2051-2075), and the distant future (2076-2100). The time frame spanning from 1980 to 2005 was designated as the historical period for comparing the data collected from synoptic stations with the simulations generated by CMIP5 models. The validity of observational and modeled data from 1980 to 2005 has been assessed using statistical measures such as the mean bias error (MBE), root mean square error (RMSE), and Pearson correlation coefficient (r). The non-parametric sense approach was employed to calculate the slope of the data trend in the time series. The present study utilized CORDEX-WAS dataset with a spatial resolution of 0.44 arc degrees. The dynamical downscaling was performed using the RCA4 model for regional climate modeling (RCM) and the r1i1p1 ensemble.

Results and discussion

The findings indicated that the MPI-ESM-LR model, when implemented with the CORDEX dynamical downscaling approach, demonstrates a high level of accuracy in forecasting seasonal temperature extremes in Iran. This is evident from its average correlation coefficient of 0.99, average RMSE index of 0.55° c, and MBE of -0.3° c. The majority of stations have mean square error values that are below 1 ° c. The greatest bias was found in Bandar Lengeh, with a deviation of 1.6° c, while the smallest bias was found in Sanandaj, with a deviation of 0.06° c. The average error deviation index reveals that Khorram Abad had the highest positive skewness, measuring 0.81° c, whereas Dushan Tappeh displayed the highest negative skewness, measuring -1.8°c. Throughout the year, the lowest rise in air temperature under the 2.6 RCP scenario in the distant future is 7.1°, 21.5°, 25.7°, and 10.8° c. The highest temperature increase in the pessimistic scenario is 8.5 RCP in the distant future. The expected temperatures for winter, spring, summer, and autumn are 10.5°, 25.7°, 30.3°, and 14.9° c, respectively. During the historical period, the mean air temperature in winter, spring, summer, and autumn was 6.3°, 20.3°, 24.8°, and 9.9° c, respectively. In RCP 2.6, the spring, summer, and autumn seasons exhibit a declining trend in temperature. Specifically, the temperature decreases by -0.037°, -0.075°, and -0.037 ° c every decade, respectively. However, in other times and scenarios, the model and station data from the historical period consistently demonstrate a rising temperature trend throughout all seasons. During the winter season, the highest deviation from the average temperature occurs in the Zagros, Sablan, and Sahand Mountains in the western and northwestern regions of the country. Conversely, the lowest deviation from the average temperature is observed in the low-altitude parts of the desert plain and the eastern slopes of Shirkouh. During the spring season, the northwest and Zagros mountains have the most deviation from the average maximum temperature, while the coastal parts of the Caspian and the eastern part of the country see the lowest deviation from the average minimum temperature. During the summer season, the northwest and western regions of the country have had the highest temperature anomalies in most times and scenarios. Conversely, the southeast regions of Jask and Chabahar have shown the lowest temperature anomalies. During the autumn season, the eastern half of the country, particularly the southeastern region and the Lut plain, experience the most deviation in temperature. The lowest temperature anomaly occurs mostly in the elevated regions of Talesh and Sabalan and sometimes on the western slopes of the Zagros Mountains.

Conclusion

Regarding the projected increase in air temperature in the upcoming decades and the concern of water stress, it is recommended to carefully strategize future water management, particularly in arid and semi-arid areas. This planning should take into account population growth as well as the development of industrial and agricultural sectors. Additionally, the impact of climate change on water demand and water resources must be taken into consideration.
Keywords
Iran
Temperature anomaly
CMIP5
CORDEX
MPI-ESM-LR

1-    Abdoli, S., Azizi, G., & Borna, R. (2021). Evaluation of air temperature and precipitation changes in the rainy region of western Iran under climate change conditions. Physical Geography Quarterly, 14(53), 1-18.
2-    2. Ahmadi, H., Fallah Ghalhari, G. A., & Baaghideh, M. (2019). Projection of Climate Change Impacts on Seasonal Precipitation in Iranian Cold Regions Based on Radiative Forcing Scenarios (RCP). Journal of the Earth and Space Physics, 45(1), 177-196.
3-    3. Aihaiti, A., Jiang, Z. H., Zhu, L. H., Li, W & You, Q. L. (2021). Risk changes of compound temperature and precipitation extremes in China under 1.5 ◦C and 2 ◦C. global warming. Atmos Res, 264, 2-8.
4-    4. Asgari, E., Baaghideh, M., Kamyar, A., Entezari, A., & Hosseini, M. (2020). An Overview of Climate Changes of Temperature and Precipitation in the CORDEX Range of South Asia (Case Study: Dez Watershed). Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 18(1), 252-225.
5-    5. Bano Medina, J., Manzanas, R., Cimadevilla, E., Fernández, J., González-Abad, J., Cofino, A. S. & Gutiérrez, J. M. (2022). Downscaling multi-model climate projection ensembles with deep learning (DeepESD): contribution to CORDEX EUR-44 Geosci. Model Dev, 15, 6747–6758.
6-    6. Carvalho, D., Cardoso Pereira, S., & Rocha, A. (2020). Future surface temperature changes for the Iberian Peninsula according to EUROCORDEX climate projections. Clim. Dyn, 56(1–2), 123–138.
7-    7. Chen, J., Yang, Y., & Tang, J. (2022). Bias correction of surface air temperature and precipitation in CORDEX East Asia simulation: What should we do when applying bias correction? Atmospheric Research, 280, 1-16.
8-    8. Dadashi-Roudbari, A. (2020). Time-spatial verdaic analysis of vertical and horizontal patterns of fine dust and evaluation of its climate feedbacks in Iran. Ph.D. thesis in meteorology, Supervisor: Mahmoud Ahmadi, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University, Faculty of Earth Sciences.
9-    9. Dai, c., Qin, X. S., Zhang, X. L., & Liu, B. J. (2022). Study of climate change impact on hydro-climatic extremes in the Hanjiang River basin, China, using CORDEX-EAS data. Weather and Climate Extremes, 38, 1-14.
10-    10. Demissie, T. A. (2023). Impact of climate change on hydrologic components using CORDEX Africa climate model in Gilgel Gibe 1 watershed Ethiopia. Heliyon, 9, 1-13.
11-    11. Dosio, A., & Fischer, E. M. (2018). Will half a degree make a difference? Robust projections of indices of mean and extreme climate in Europe under 1.5°C, 2°C, and 3°C global warming. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(2), 935–944.
12-    12. Ekstrom, M., Grose, M. R., & Whetton, P. H. (2015). An appraisal of downscaling methods used in climate change research Wiley Interdiscip. Rev: Clim. Change, 6, 301–319.
13-    13. Farzaneh, M., Arbabi Sabzevari, A., Daryabari, S. J., & Asadian, F. (2021). Perspectives on Climatic Conditions of the Next Decades in the Southeast of the Country. Journal of Climate Research, 46, 147-160.
14-    14. Fathian, F., Ghadami, M., & Dehgan, Z. (2022). Observed and projected changes in temperature and precipitation extremes based on CORDEX data over Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 149, 569-592.
15-    15. Field, C. B., Barros, V. R., Dokken, D. J., Mach K. J., Mastrandrea M. D., Bilir T. E, et al. (2014). IPCC. White LL (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part a: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1581 PP. 
16-    16. Gao, Q. J., Li, Y., & Han, T. X. (2021). Intra-seasonal features of an extreme high temperature event in 2011 in eastern China and its atmospheric circulation. Trop. Meteorol, 27, 437–446.
17-    17. Ge, F., Zhu, S. P., Luo, H. L., Zhi, X. F., & Wang, H. (2021). Future changes in precipitation extremes over Southeast Asia: insights from CMIP6 multi-model ensemble Environ. Res. Lett, 16, 1-11.
18-    18. Girma, R., Furst, C., & Moges, A. (2022). Performance evaluation of CORDEX-Africa regional climate models in simulating climate variables over Ethiopian main rift valley: Evidence from Gidabo river basin for impact modeling studies. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, 99, 286-298.
19-    19. Hamed, M. M., Nashwan, M. S., & Shahid, S. (2022). Inconsistency in historical simulations and future projections of temperature and rainfall: A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models over Southeast Asia. Atmospheric Research, 265, 1-14.
20-    20. Hasheminasab, F. S., Rahimi, D., Zakerinejad, R. & Kropáček, J. (2022). Assessment of climate change impact on surface water: a case study—Karoun River Basin, Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 15(904), 1866-1875.
21-    21. Hassan, I., Kalin, R. M., White, C. J., & Aladejana, J. A. (2020). Selection of CMIP5 GCM Ensemble for the Projection of Spatio-Temporal Changes in Precipitation and Temperature over the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Water, 12(2), 1-33.
22-    22. Heydarzadeh, M., Nohagar, A., Malekian, A., & Khurani, A. (2018). Evaluation of the effects of future climate change on meteorological parameters of precipitation and temperature (case study: Bandar Abbas city). 6th Regional Conference on Climate Change, November, Tehran, 1-11.
23-    23. IPCC. (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, 1535 pp.
24-    24. IPCC. (2021). Summary for policymakers Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ed V Masson-Delmotte (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 3–32.
25-    25. Jahangir, M. H., & Gharadaghi, L. (2022). Assessing the Performance of SDSM Models in Downscaling Annual Precipitation and Temperature Values Simulated Via CANESM2 Model: A Case Study of East Azerbaijan Province. Desert Ecosystem Engineering, 10(32), 45-60.
26-    26. Kaseri, M., Goudarzi, M., Janbazghobadi, G., & Motevalli, S. (2021). Projection of Precipitation Changes in Southern Coast of Caspian Sea at the End of 21st Century using Different RCPs. Geographical Planning of Space, 11(40), 103-118.
27-    27. Lee et al. (2023). Uncertainty analysis of future summer monsoon duration and area over East Asia using a multi-GCM/multi-RCM ensemble. Environ. Res. Lett, 18, 1-11.
28-    28. Miri, M., Masoompour Samakosh, J., Raziei, T., Jalilian, A., & Mahmodi, M. (2021). Spatial and Temporal Variability of Temperature in Iran for the Twenty-First Century Foreseen by the CMIP5 GCM Models. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 178, 169-184.
29-    29. Pathak, R., Sahany, S., Mishra, S. K., & Dash, S.K. (2019). Precipitation biases in CMIP5 models over the South Asian Region. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1-13.
30-    30. Polong, F., Chen, H., Sun, S., & Ongoma V. (2019). Temporal and spatial evolution of the standard precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) in the Tana River basin, Kenya. Theor. Appl. Climatol, 138 (1-2), 777-792.
31-    31. Raftery, A. E., Zimmer, A., Frierson, D. M. W., Startz, R., & Liu, P. (2017). Less than 2 °C warming by 2100 unlikely. Nature Climate Change,7(9), 637–641. 
32-    32. Rahimi, J., Laux, P., & Khalili, A. (2020). Assessment of climate change over Iran: CMIP5 results and their presentation in terms of Koppen–Geiger climate zones. Theor Appl Climatol, 141, 183–199.
33-    33. Rashidi Ghane, M., Motevalli, S., janbaz Ghobadi, G. R., & Kouhi, M. (2023). Evaluation of the ability of three statistical methods to downscale the output of temperature and precipitation of CMIP6 models in the Kashfrud basin. Journal of Climate Research, 53, 117-132.
34-    34. Salah, M., Moursy, F., Soliman, E., & GAMAL, G. (2023). Assessing the potential impacts of climate change on droughts in East Africa using CORDEX-CORE regional climate models simulations: A focus on Tanzania. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 53 (3), 271-300.
35-    35. Seker, M., & Gumus, V. (2022). Projection of temperature and precipitation in the Mediterranean region through multi-model ensemble from CMIP6. Atmospheric Research, 280, 1-15.
36-    36. Shahbazikia, S., gorbani dashtaki, S., Yarahmadi, J., Ostevary, Y., & mirzaei, S. (2023). Predicting changes in precipitation and temperature of Tabriz synoptic station during the period 2100-2020. Journal of Climate Research, 52, 125-142.
37-    37. Taghavinia, F., Zeinali, B., & Dadashi-Roudbari, A. (2023). Validation of temperature and precipitation variables of CMIP5 models in Iran under CORDEX-WAS and NEX-GDDP projects. Physical Geography Research Quarterly, 55(2), 111-132.
38-    38. Tan, G., Ayugi, B., Ngoma, H., & Ongoma, V. (2020). Projections of future meteorological drought events under representative concentration pathways (RCPs) of CMIP5 over Kenya, East Africa. Atmos. Res, 246, 1-13.
39-    39. Teichmann, C. et al. (2021). Assessing mean climate change signals in the global CORDEX‑CORE ensemble. Climate Dynamics, 57, 1269–1292.
40-    40. Tran-Anh, q., Ngo-Duc, T., Espagne, E., & Trinh-Tuan, L. (2023). A 10-km CMIP6 downscaled dataset of temperature and precipitation for historical and future Vietnam climate. Scientific Data, 10(257), 1-12.
41-    41. Ukkola, A. M., De Kauwe, M. G., Roderick, M. L., Abramowitz, G., & Pitman, A. J. (2020). Robust future changes in meteorological drought in CMIP6 projections despite uncertainty in precipitation Geophys. Res. Lett, 47, 1-9.
42-    42. Vautard R et al. (2021). Evaluation of the large EURO-CORDEX regional climate model ensemble. Geophys. Res, 126, 1-28.
43-    43. Wang, Z. Q., Luo, H. L. & Yang, S. (2023). Different mechanisms for the extremely hot central-eastern China in July–August 2022 from a Eurasian large-scale circulation perspective Environ. Res. Lett, 18, 1-10.
44-    44. Yang, X., Wood, E. F., Sheffield, J., Ren, L., Zhang, M., & Wang, Y. (2018). Bias correction of historical and future simulations of precipitation and temperature for China from CMIP5 models. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 19(3), 609-623.
45-    45. Yu, E., Liu, D., Yang, J., Sun, J., Yu, L., King, M. P. (2023). Future climate change for major agricultural zones in China as projected by CORDEX-EA-II, CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensembles. Atmospheric Research, 288, 156-169.
46-    46. zarrin, A., & Dadashi-Roudbari, A. (2021). Projected changes in temperature over Iran by 2040 based on CMIP6 multi-model ensemble. Physical Geography Research Quarterly, 53(1), 75-90.
47-    47. Zarrin, A., & Dadashi-Roudbari, A. (2023). Investigating the Impacts of Climate Change on Water Security in Iran. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 10(1), 37-44.
48-    48. Zhai, P. M, Zhou, B. Q. & Chen, Y. (2018). A review of climate change attribution studies. Meteorol. Res, 32, 671–692.
49-    49. Zhang, G. W., Zeng, G., Yang, X. Y. & Jiang, Z. H. (2020). Future changes in extreme high temperature over China at 1.5◦C–5◦C global warming based on CMIP6 simulations Adv. Atmos. Sci, 38, 253–267.
50-    50. Zhu, H. H., Jiang, Z. H., Li, J., Li, W., Sun, C. X. & Li, L. (2020). Does CMIP6 inspire more confidence in simulating climate extremes over China. Adv. Atmos. Sci, 37, 1119–1132.
 
51-    Yan, J. W. (2021). Rapid rises in the magnitude and risk of extreme regional heat wave events in China. Weather and Climate Extremes, 34, 100379.
52-    Yan, Y. et. al. (2017), Characterizing spatial-temporal changes of heat waves in China using center of gravity analysis, Physical Geography, 38, 4, 379-391.
53-    Yazdanpanah, H., & Alizadeh, T. (2011). estimating the probability of different duration heat waves occurrence in kerman, province using markov chain. Geographical research, 26(3 (102)), 51-71. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/29715/en.
Journal of Climate Research
Volume 1403, Issue 59 - Serial Number 59
Vol. 15, No. 59,, Autumn 2024
Winter 2025
Pages 109-125